Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

05:36
Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
Published on: October 18, 2024
Prevalence of calibration errors in goldmann applanation tonometers
Heydar Amini1, Sasan Moghimi, Mahboobe Golestani
1Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran Medical University, Tehran, Iran.
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research
|December 1, 2012
Summary
Calibration errors are common in Goldmann applanation tonometers. A high percentage of devices at Farabi Eye Hospital exceeded recommended calibration ranges, potentially impacting clinical accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Device Calibration
- Glaucoma Diagnosis
Background:
- Goldmann applanation tonometry is a standard method for measuring intraocular pressure.
- Accurate calibration of tonometers is crucial for reliable glaucoma diagnosis and management.
- Previous studies have indicated potential issues with tonometer calibration, necessitating further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the prevalence of calibration errors in Goldmann applanation tonometers.
- To quantify the extent of calibration deviations from manufacturer specifications.
- To identify the proportion of tonometers falling outside acceptable calibration limits.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study was conducted at Farabi Eye Hospital.
- All in-use Haag-Streit Goldmann applanation tonometers were evaluated.
- Calibration was checked by independent observers using the manufacturer's protocol, with a third observer for discrepancies.
Main Results:
- Out of 43 evaluated Goldmann tonometers, significant calibration errors were found.
- 93% of tonometers deviated by more than ±0.5 mmHg from the recommended calibration.
- 28% of devices exceeded the acceptable ±2.5 mmHg calibration error margin.
Conclusions:
- A substantial majority of Goldmann tonometers at the hospital exhibited calibration errors beyond the manufacturer's recommended range.
- A notable percentage of tonometers were outside the clinically acceptable calibration limits.
- Further research is recommended to explore the clinical implications of these calibration inaccuracies.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
Several factors...
Errors in Taping
Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...
Instrument Calibration
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

