Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Readout Sweet Spots for Spin Qubits with Strong Spin-Orbit Interaction.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

The origins of noise in the Zeeman splitting of spin qubits in natural-silicon devices.

NPJ quantum information·2026
Same author

High-Temperature Superconductivity from Finite-Range Attractive Interaction.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Toward Gate-Tunable Topological Superconductivity in a Supramolecular Electron Spin Lattice.

Nano letters·2025
Same author

Level Generation With Quantum Reservoir Computing.

IEEE computer graphics and applications·2025
Same author

Compromise-free scaling of qubit speed and coherence.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

An Introduction to Processing, Fitting, and Interpreting Transient Absorption Data
08:12

An Introduction to Processing, Fitting, and Interpreting Transient Absorption Data

Published on: February 16, 2024

High threshold error correction for the surface code.

James R Wootton1, Daniel Loss

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.

Physical Review Letters
|December 11, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new algorithm enhances surface code quantum memory by correcting depolarizing noise up to an 18.5% error rate. This efficient method offers polynomial time complexity for realistic quantum code sizes.

More Related Videos

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
11:08

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Published on: June 19, 2018

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

An Introduction to Processing, Fitting, and Interpreting Transient Absorption Data
08:12

An Introduction to Processing, Fitting, and Interpreting Transient Absorption Data

Published on: February 16, 2024

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
11:08

Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Published on: June 19, 2018

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Quantum computing
  • Quantum information science
  • Error correction codes

Background:

  • Surface codes are crucial for building fault-tolerant quantum computers.
  • Quantum memory is susceptible to depolarizing noise, limiting performance.
  • Efficient error correction is essential for scalable quantum computation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel algorithm for quantum error correction in surface codes.
  • To improve the threshold error rate for correcting depolarizing noise.
  • To ensure the algorithm's efficiency for practical quantum memory applications.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new error correction algorithm tailored for surface codes.
  • Analysis of the algorithm's performance against depolarizing noise.
  • Computational complexity analysis to determine time efficiency.

Main Results:

  • The algorithm corrects depolarizing noise up to a threshold error rate of 18.5%.
  • This performance approaches the theoretical upper bound of 18.9%.
  • The algorithm exhibits polynomial time complexity with respect to error suppression.

Conclusions:

  • The presented algorithm significantly advances quantum error correction capabilities for surface codes.
  • It offers a viable solution for efficient error mitigation in realistic quantum memory systems.
  • The findings pave the way for more robust and scalable quantum computing architectures.