Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026
06:08
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
Process-related factors associated with disciplinary board decisions
Søren Birkeland1, Rene dePont Christensen, Niels Damsbo
1Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DK, Denmark. sbirkeland@health.sdu.dk
BMC Health Services Research
|January 9, 2013
Summary
The number of general practitioners involved in a complaint case decreased the odds of disciplinary action for the defendant. Longer case management duration increased the odds of discipline for both parties.
Area of Science:
- Medical Law
- Health Care Policy
- Disciplinary Actions
Background:
- Patient complaints are processed by disciplinary boards in healthcare systems.
- Understanding the role of complaint process factors in board decisions is limited.
- This study examines factors influencing disciplinary actions against general practitioners.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify process factors statistically associated with disciplinary actions.
- To analyze these associations from both complainant and defendant perspectives.
- To investigate the impact of complaint process on general practitioner discipline.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of Danish Patient Complaints Board decisions for general practitioners (2007).
- Extraction of process factors: complaint delay, lawyer involvement, number of GPs, event duration, expert witness, case management duration.
- Logistic regression analysis for complainant and defendant perspectives.
Main Results:
- Increased number of general practitioners involved decreased discipline odds for the defendant (OR=0.661, p<0.001).
- Longer case management duration increased discipline odds for both parties (OR=1.038 per month, p=0.010).
- No significant association found for complaint delay, lawyer involvement, event duration, or expert witness involvement.
Conclusions:
- Complaint process factors show statistical associations with disciplinary outcomes.
- The impact of these factors differs between complainant and defendant viewpoints.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying judicial mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Conduct Disorder
Conduct disorder is a complex mental health diagnosis characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior that violates societal norms, the rights of others, or age-appropriate rules. The diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder require the presence of at least three problematic behaviors within the past 12 months, with at least one occurring in the past six months. These behaviors are grouped into four categories: aggression toward people and animals; destruction of property;...
01:08Obedience
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
03:20The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
01:17Correspondence Bias
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
01:21Behavior Modification
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
02:20Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”