The Management Standards Indicator Tool and evaluation of burnout
J M Ravalier1, A McVicar, C Munn-Giddings
1Faculty of Health, Social Care & Education, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK. jermaine.ravalier@newham.ac.uk
The UK Health and Safety Executive's Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT) shows promise in assessing workplace burnout risk. It aligns with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS), identifying key concerns like demands and relationships.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Psychological Assessment
- Workplace Well-being
Background:
- Psychosocial workplace hazards significantly affect employee health.
- The UK Health and Safety Executive's Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT) is recognized for assessing health impacts.
- Limited research exists on the MSIT's utility in evaluating burnout.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the MSIT in assessing burnout risk.
- To compare MSIT findings with burnout levels measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS).
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 128 borough council employees.
- MSIT data were analyzed against established MSIT and MBI-GS thresholds.
- Multivariate linear regression was employed with MBI-GS factors as dependent variables.
Main Results:
- MSIT factor scores correlated with burnout risk categories defined by MBI-GS thresholds.
- Priority workplace concerns identified by MSIT included demands, relationships, role, and change.
- Regression analysis indicated that demands, control, change, and role were significant predictors of burnout dimensions (exhaustion, cynicism, professional efficacy).
Conclusions:
- MSIT analysis demonstrates general congruence with MBI-GS burnout assessments.
- The MSIT's potential to incorporate relationship, role, and change factors enhances its validity for burnout assessment.
- Further research is needed to clarify the MSIT's threshold settings for the control factor.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques I
Conscientiousness
Conscientious individuals tend to be organized, responsible, and disciplined. They prioritize completing tasks and following structured routines,...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as "workaholics," they...
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...
Critical Thinking I
