Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Ten year research update (2001-2010): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence)
Michael H Fogel1, Wendy Schiffman, Denise Mumley
1Department of Forensic Psychology, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 325 N. Wells Street, Chicago, IL 60654, USA. mfogel@thechicagoschool.edu
Abstract:
This article reviews and evaluates publications during 2001-2010 with relevance for assessments of competence to stand trial, referred to in this article as adjudicative competence. The review focuses specifically on articles that provide new concepts or data supported by research or case analyses. The studies are reviewed under the following headings: (i) systemic issues, (ii) conceptual guidelines for AC evaluations, (iii) AC assessment methods, (iv) empirical correlates of AC judgments and psycholegal abilities, (v) quality of AC evaluations and reports, (vi) interpretive issues, (vii) special populations (defendants who are elderly, defendants with intellectual disabilities), (viii) AC evaluations of juveniles, and (ix) treatment of incompetent defendants. Suggestions are offered for further research to advance the quality of clinical evaluations of adjudicative competence.
Related Concept Videos
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Wechsler's Contribution to Measures of Intelligence
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
