Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Temporal and nontemporal control in a midsession reversal task with variable intertrial intervals.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026

Same author

The 'less-is-better' effect in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus sp.): Some data and a contrast-like hypothesis.

Behavioural processes·2025

Same author

Starlings solve the ephemeral reward task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025

Same author

Reversal learning and aging: Exploring simple discrimination learning, learning-set, and functional classes.

Learning & behavior·2025

Same author

Midsession Reversal Task with Variable Trial Spacings: Further Tests of the Timing Hypothesis with Starlings.

Perspectives on behavior science·2025

Same author

Pigeons' performance in the number-left task: Associative or computational mechanism?

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

What do humans learn in a double, temporal bisection task: absolute or relative stimulus durations?

Igor Spínola¹, Armando Machado, Marilia Pinheiro de Carvalho

¹University of Minho, Portugal.

Behavioural Processes

|January 29, 2013

Summary

This study investigated temporal discrimination, finding that human perception of stimulus duration is only partially explained by the relative-coding hypothesis. Absolute coding may also play a role in how we perceive time.

More Related Videos

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Eye Movements in Visual Duration Perception: Disentangling Stimulus from Time in Predecisional Processes

Published on: January 19, 2024

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Psychophysics

Background:

The relative-coding hypothesis suggests humans judge stimulus duration based on comparisons.
The double bisection task is commonly used to test this hypothesis.

Purpose of the Study:

To test the relative-coding hypothesis of temporal discrimination.
To investigate whether participants code stimulus durations absolutely or relatively.
To refine the double bisection task by incorporating varied sample durations.

Main Methods:

Replication and enhancement of the double bisection task.
Introduction of multiple sample durations during testing.
Analysis of psychometric functions to assess temporal discrimination.

Main Results:

Experiment 1 partially supported the relative-coding hypothesis.
Experiment 2 did not support the relative-coding hypothesis.
Combined data from both experiments offered partial corroboration.

Conclusions:

The relative-coding hypothesis provides an incomplete explanation for temporal discrimination.
An alternative explanation involving absolute coding of temporal stimuli is proposed.
Further research is needed to fully understand temporal coding mechanisms.