Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

13:44
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
Accuracy of pattern detection methods in the performance of golf putting
Micael S Couceiro1, Gonçalo Dias, Rui Mendes
1RoboCorp, Department of Electrical Engineering, Engineering Institute of Coimbra, Portugal. micael@isec.pt
Journal of Motor Behavior
|February 15, 2013
Summary
This study compared five pattern detection methods for classifying golf putting performance. These techniques can identify unique player "putting signatures" and analyze motor control in sports.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
- Motor Control
Background:
- Golf putting performance relies on complex motor coordination.
- Objective analysis of putting technique is crucial for skill improvement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the classification accuracy of five pattern detection methods for golf putting.
- To identify a unique 'putting signature' for individual golfers.
- To assess the applicability of these methods in motor control studies.
Main Methods:
- Computer vision for golf club position detection.
- Darwinian particle swarm optimization for kinematic model estimation.
- Classification using linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, naive Bayes (normal distribution and kernel smoothing), and least squares support vector machines.
Main Results:
- The study evaluated the classification accuracy of five distinct pattern detection algorithms.
- Individualized 'putting signatures' were successfully identified for each golf player.
- The methods demonstrated potential for analyzing coordination and motor control in putting.
Conclusions:
- The presented pattern detection methods are effective for classifying golf putting performance.
- These techniques offer valuable insights into intra- and interpersonal variability in motor behavior.
- The findings support the application of these methods in sports science and motor control research.
Related Concept Videos
Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate measurements...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This number is...

