Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 13, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator: experience from a high-volume Belgian implantation
Frederik H Verbrugge1, Philippe De Vusser, Maximo Rivero-Ayerza
1Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) and without (CRT-P) showed similar clinical outcomes. Patient selection for CRT-D/P was appropriate, with CRT-D reserved for high-risk arrhythmia patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is vital for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and ventricular conduction delay.
- The addition of a defibrillator function (CRT-D) to CRT (CRT-P) is debated due to healthcare budget constraints in aging populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the experience of a high-volume Belgian center with CRT-D and CRT-P implantation.
- To compare outcomes between CRT-D and CRT-P patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 221 consecutive CRT patients implanted between October 2008 and April 2011.
- Analysis focused on 74 CRT-D and 98 CRT-P patients with complete follow-up.
- Comparison of reverse left ventricular remodeling, NYHA functional class, maximal aerobic capacity, mortality, and hospitalizations.
Main Results:
- Both CRT-D and CRT-P groups showed similar improvements in reverse left ventricular remodeling, NYHA class, and aerobic capacity.
- Mean follow-up was 18 months; annual mortality was 8% and equal in both groups.
- CRT-D patients predominantly died from pump failure, while CRT-P patients died from pump failure, comorbidity, or sudden death. Yearly attributable risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmia was 8.16% in CRT-D vs. 1.38% in CRT-P.
Conclusions:
- Patient selection for CRT-D/P in Belgium, considering reimbursement and physician discretion, was appropriate.
- Both CRT-D and CRT-P demonstrated similar positive impacts on remodeling, function, and clinical outcomes.
- CRT-D was appropriately used for high-risk arrhythmia patients, though a 1.38% yearly risk of sudden death persisted in CRT-P patients.
Objective:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important treatment modality for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and ventricular conduction delay. Considering limited health care budgets in an aging population, adding a defibrillator function to CRT remains a matter of debate. Our aim was to describe the experience of a high-volume Belgian implantation centre with CRT with/without defibrillator (CRT-D/P).
Methods And Results:
Consecutive CRT patients (n = 221), implanted between October 2008 and April 2011 in Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (Genk), were reviewed. From 209 primo-implantations, 74 CRT-D and 98 CRT-P patients with complete follow-up inside the centre, were analysed. Despite differences in baseline characteristics, both groups demonstrated similar reverse left ventricular remodelling, improvement in New York Heart Association functional class and maximal aerobic capacity. During mean follow-up of 18 +/- 9 months, 21 patients died and 83 spent a total of 1200 days in hospital. Annual mortality was 8% and equal among the groups. The mode of death differed between CRT-D (predominantly pump failure) and CRT-P patients (pump failure, comorbidity and sudden death). The yearly population attributable risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmia was 8.16% in CRT-D and 1.38% in CRT-P patients.
Conclusions:
With current guidelines applied to the Belgian reimbursement criteria and at physicians'discretion, patient selection for CRT-D/ CRT-P was appropriate, with similar reverse remodelling, functional capacity improvement and good clinical outcome in both groups. High-risk patients for malignant ventricular arrhythmia were more likely to receive CRT-D, although the yearly attributable risk remained 1.38% in CRT-P patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

