Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Blinding01:11

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hypothetical Bias in the SG and TTO.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

The prevention puzzle.

The Geneva risk and insurance review·2022
Same author

The QALY at 50: One story many voices.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2022
Same author

Insurance decisions under nonperformance risk and ambiguity.

Journal of risk and uncertainty·2021
Same author

Rational policymaking during a pandemic.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021
Same author

Reply to: Why fossil fuel producer subsidies matter.

Nature·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 12, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Treatment decisions under ambiguity.

Loïc Berger1, Han Bleichrodt, Louis Eeckhoudt

  • 1Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.

Journal of Health Economics
|March 30, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Ambiguity aversion significantly impacts medical decisions. When diagnosis is uncertain, people are more likely to seek treatment. However, if treatment effects are unclear, they become less inclined to undergo it.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Medical Decision Making
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Many health risks lack reliable and credible information, leading to ambiguity.
  • Traditional health economics models often assume ambiguity neutrality, contrasting with empirical evidence of ambiguity aversion.
  • Ambiguity aversion, the tendency to react strongly to uncertainty, is a key factor in decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of ambiguity aversion on two fundamental medical decision problems.
  • To analyze how uncertainty in diagnosis and treatment outcomes influences patient choices.

Main Methods:

  • The study models two classical medical decision problems.
  • It incorporates ambiguity aversion into the decision-making framework.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

  • Analysis focuses on the propensity to opt for treatment under different types of ambiguity.

    • Main Results:

    • Ambiguity regarding a patient's diagnosis increases the likelihood of choosing treatment.
    • Conversely, ambiguity about the effects of a treatment decreases the propensity to select that treatment.
    • These findings highlight the nuanced role of ambiguity aversion in medical choices.

    Conclusions:

    • Ambiguity aversion is a critical factor in medical decision-making, influencing choices differently based on the source of uncertainty.
    • Healthcare providers and policymakers should consider psychological responses to ambiguity when designing interventions and communicating risks.
    • Understanding ambiguity aversion can lead to more effective health economic models and improved patient outcomes.