Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

09:32
Mechanical Expansion of Steel Tubing as a Solution to Leaky Wellbores
Published on: November 20, 2014
Slug tests in wells screened across the water table: some additional considerations
1Group of Hydrogeology, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Ground Water
|April 16, 2013
Summary
Standard slug tests for shallow groundwater contamination face challenges due to well design and filter pack drainage. Proper well assessment and data analysis are crucial for accurate hydraulic conductivity estimates.
Area of Science:
- Hydrogeology
- Environmental Science
- Geotechnical Engineering
Background:
- Slug tests are commonly used to assess groundwater contamination sites.
- Standard slug test models do not account for mechanisms present in wells screened across the water table.
- Practical issues arise from well design, test duration, and filter pack effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- Address four practical issues in slug testing at shallow groundwater contamination sites.
- Improve the reliability of slug test data and analysis.
- Provide guidance for accurate hydraulic conductivity estimation.
Main Methods:
- Assessing well design suitability prior to field testing.
- Utilizing mass balance to differentiate test phases (filter pack drainage vs. formation response).
- Estimating the effective casing radius directly from test data.
Main Results:
- Well design significantly impacts slug test data quality (signal-to-noise ratio).
- Mass balance aids in correctly identifying test phases.
- The effective casing radius, not the nominal radius, is critical for accurate modeling.
- Conventional models can provide reasonable estimates if applied to the formation-response phase.
Conclusions:
- Careful well selection and design assessment are essential for reliable slug testing.
- Advanced data analysis techniques are needed to overcome limitations of standard models.
- Accurate estimation of the effective casing radius is paramount for valid results.

