Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Echocardiographic Characterization of Left Ventricular Structure, Function, and Coronary Flow in Neonate Mice
Published on: April 7, 2022
Diagnostic utility of specific electrocardiographical parameters in predicting left ventricular function
Altug Cincin1, Beste Ozben, Okan Erdogan
1Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Insights
Electrocardiography (ECG) parameters, including QRS duration and Goldberger criteria, can predict left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in heart failure patients. These bedside tests offer valuable diagnostic insights before advanced imaging.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Diagnostics
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Electrocardiography (ECG) changes are common in heart failure (HF) patients.
- Observed ECG parameters include sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, bundle branch blocks, Q waves, and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the diagnostic utility of specific ECG parameters for predicting LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
- To correlate ECG findings with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with suspected HF.
Main Methods:
- 123 patients with suspected HF and 20 with NYHA class IV HF were recruited.
- ECG parameters including QRS duration, dispersion, and Goldberger criteria (first, second, and third) were measured.
- Parameters were correlated with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) determined by echocardiography.
Main Results:
- A QRS duration ≥124 ms significantly predicted LVSD (OR 4.1, P=0.001).
- Goldberger's first and third criteria were more frequent in the LVSD group (OR 8.3, P=0.001 and OR 8.9, P<0.001, respectively).
- Logistic regression identified QRS duration ≥124 ms and Goldberger's first and third criteria as independent predictors of LVSD.
Conclusions:
- Bedside ECG parameters, specifically Goldberger criteria and QRS duration, are valuable for predicting LVSD in suspected HF.
- These ECG findings can aid in early risk stratification before advanced diagnostic procedures.
Background:
Changes in electrocardiography (ECG) parameters, including sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, bundle branch blocks, Q waves and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, are commonly observed in patients with heart failure (HF).
Objectives:
To determine whether specific ECG parameters have a diagnostic role in predicting LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in patients with suspected HF.
Methods:
A total of 123 patients with symptoms or signs of HF and 20 HF patients with New York Heart Association class IV status were consecutively recruited. Several ECG parameters, including QRS duration, dispersion and SV1 or SV2 + RV5 or RV6 ≥3.5 mV (Goldberger's first criterion), QRS amplitude ≤0.8 mV in the limb leads (Goldberger's second criterion) and RV4/SV4 <1 (Goldberger's third criterion), were subsequently determined and correlated with LV ejection fraction (LVEF).
Results:
One hundred six patients had LVEF <50% (LVSD group), while 37 patients had LVEF ≥50% (non-LVSD group). The maximal QRS duration of the LVSD group was significantly longer than that of the non-LVSD group (124.5±20.8 ms versus 109.7±13.1 ms; P<0.001). ROC analysis revealed that a cut-off point of QRS duration ≥124 ms significantly predicted LVSD (OR 4.1 [95% CI 1.7 to 10.2]; P=0.001). The frequencies of Goldberger's first and third criteria were higher in the LVSD group (OR 8.3 [95% CI 1.9 to 36.4]; P=0.001; and OR 8.9 [95% CI 3.4 to 23.2]; P<0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that Goldberger's first and third criteria as well as QRS duration ≥124 ms were independent predictors of LVSD.
Conclusion:
Bedside ECG parameters, such as the Goldberger criteria, may be useful in predicting LVSD before the use of more sophisticated diagnostic tests is considered in patients with suspected HF.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Wave Parameters
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes

