Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

09:49
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Eyewitness identification law reform: the need for persistence
1Law Faculty, Department of Psychology, Monash University. I.Freckelton@vicbar.com.au
Journal of Law and Medicine
|April 23, 2013
Summary
Eyewitness identification evidence poses significant risks, as shown by overturned convictions and psychology research. Legal systems must better incorporate social science findings to prevent misidentification and wrongful convictions.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Legal Psychology
- Criminal Justice
Background:
- Extensive research, including DNA evidence and experimental psychology, highlights the unreliability of eyewitness identification.
- Legal systems worldwide have implemented safeguards like identification parades and judicial warnings to mitigate these risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the limitations of legal checks, specifically the due process check in the U.S. Supreme Court case Perry v. New Hampshire, in addressing eyewitness misidentification.
- To advocate for greater integration of social science research into legal practices to reduce wrongful convictions.
Main Methods:
- Review of legal precedents, focusing on Supreme Court decisions concerning eyewitness identification.
- Analysis of experimental psychology findings on factors influencing identification accuracy.
- Comparative examination of legal safeguards across different jurisdictions.
Main Results:
- The Supreme Court's decision in Perry v. New Hampshire (2012) limited the due process check to cases involving established police misconduct, overlooking inherent unreliability due to suggestive factors.
- Current legal frameworks inadequately address the psychological factors contributing to misidentification.
Conclusions:
- Legal systems must evolve to better incorporate psychological science to address the inherent risks of eyewitness testimony.
- Continued international efforts are needed to develop and implement evidence-based procedures for eyewitness identification to prevent miscarriages of justice.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Bystander Effect
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
False Memories
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Perceptual Constancy
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Prosopagnosia
Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...

