Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

07:45
Quasi-light Storage for Optical Data Packets
Published on: February 6, 2014
Sleep/doze controlled dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithms for energy-efficient passive optical networks.
Maluge Pubuduni Imali Dias1, Elaine Wong
1NICTA Victoria Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. i.dias@student.unimelb.edu.au
Optics Express
|April 24, 2013
Summary
Two dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithms (DBAs) for 10 Gbps Ethernet passive optical networks (10G-EPONs) improve energy-efficiency. J-FIT offers better energy savings at low loads, while JIT provides lower average delay, both meeting quality of service requirements.
Area of Science:
- Telecommunications Engineering
- Network Energy Efficiency
- Optical Network Optimization
Background:
- 10 Gbps Ethernet Passive Optical Networks (10G-EPONs) face challenges in energy consumption.
- Optical Network Units (ONUs) with Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers (VCSELs) can enter sleep modes to save power.
- Traditional dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithms (DBAs) may not fully leverage ONU sleep capabilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comparatively evaluate two novel just-in-time (JIT) dynamic bandwidth allocation algorithms (DBAs) for 10G-EPONs.
- To assess the energy-efficiency improvements offered by JIT and J-FIT algorithms using VCSEL ONUs.
- To analyze the trade-offs between energy savings and average delay for different DBA strategies.
Main Methods:
- Simulation-based performance evaluation of two JIT DBAs: JIT (varying polling cycles) and J-FIT (fixed polling cycles).
- Comparison of energy efficiency between VCSEL ONUs and always-ON Distributed Feedback (DFB) laser ONUs.
- Analysis of key performance metrics: polling cycle time, power consumption, energy savings percentage, and average delay.
Main Results:
- Both JIT and J-FIT DBA algorithms demonstrate enhanced energy efficiency in 10G-EPONs.
- The J-FIT algorithm achieves superior energy savings, particularly under low network load conditions.
- The JIT algorithm offers a lower average delay compared to J-FIT, with both remaining within acceptable Quality of Service (QoS) limits.
Conclusions:
- JIT and J-FIT DBA algorithms effectively improve the energy efficiency of 10G-EPONs by utilizing ONU sleep modes.
- J-FIT is more energy-efficient at lower loads, while JIT minimizes average delay.
- Both algorithms provide a viable path towards energy-saving next-generation access networks while maintaining QoS.
Related Concept Videos
Bandpass Sampling
In signal processing, bandpass sampling is an effective technique for sampling signals that have most of their energy concentrated within a narrow frequency band. This type of signal is known as a bandpass signal. The key principle of bandpass sampling involves sampling the signal at a rate that is greater than twice the signal's bandwidth to prevent aliasing.
A bandpass signal has a spectrum with a lower frequency limit, denoted as ω1, and an upper frequency limit, denoted as ω2. The spectrum...
A bandpass signal has a spectrum with a lower frequency limit, denoted as ω1, and an upper frequency limit, denoted as ω2. The spectrum...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers are widely used in control systems to improve stability and reduce steady-state errors. A dimmer switch controlling the brightness of a light bulb serves as a practical example of phase-lag control, gradually adjusting the bulb's brightness. Mathematically, phase-lag control or low-pass filtering is represented when the factor 'a' is less than 1.
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any finite,...
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any finite,...