Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and β2-adrenergic receptors...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy01:26

Phase Contrast and Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy

Phase-Contrast Microscopes
In-phase-contrast microscopes, interference between light directly passing through a cell and light refracted by cellular components is used to create high-contrast, high-resolution images without staining. It is the oldest and simplest type of microscope that creates an image by altering the wavelengths of light rays passing through the specimen. Altered wavelength paths are created using an annular stop in the condenser. The annular stop produces a hollow cone of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of Crowding Distance in Children Is Faster and Later Than Visual Acuity and Better Predicts Reading Performance.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

An increasingly efficient narrowband object-recognition channel along the ventral stream.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Which perceptual categories do observers experience during multistable perception?

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026
Same author

EasyEyes: Crowded dynamic fixation for online psychophysics.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Distinctive feature sensitivity of ocular following initiation during global motion perception.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Mesoscale developmental rivalry in human extrastriate visual cortex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

Measuring contrast sensitivity.

Denis G Pelli1, Peter Bex

  • 1Psychology Department & Center for Neural Science, New York University, USA. denis.pelli@nyu.edu

Vision Research
|May 7, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Computer testing offers efficient measurement of contrast sensitivity, a key visual capability. Objective tasks like multiple-alternative forced-choice detection minimize criterion effects for accurate vision science research.

Keywords:
Adaptive threshold estimationContrast sensitivityFechnerQUESTThreshold

More Related Videos

Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats
07:41

Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats

Published on: October 23, 2020

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test
06:00

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test

Published on: September 17, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia
08:34

The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Published on: December 14, 2012

Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats
07:41

Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats

Published on: October 23, 2020

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test
06:00

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test

Published on: September 17, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Vision science
  • Ophthalmology
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Contrast sensitivity is fundamental to vision, defining the threshold between visible and invisible stimuli.
  • Historically, threshold contrast was reported as 1% across diverse conditions, as per Fechner's 1860 review.
  • Traditional printed charts are being supplanted by computer-based methods for contrast sensitivity testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the advantages of computer-based adaptive measurement for threshold contrast.
  • To emphasize the importance of objective tasks in minimizing subjective criterion effects.
  • To recommend single-target testing for populations with potential crowding or confusion.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing computer-based adaptive procedures for efficient threshold contrast measurement.
  • Employing multiple-alternative forced-choice (MAFC) detection or identification tasks.
  • Administering single-target testing for specific patient populations.

Main Results:

  • Computer testing provides efficient and adaptive measurement of contrast sensitivity thresholds.
  • Objective tasks, such as MAFC, effectively reduce observer's subjective criterion effects.
  • Single-target presentation is beneficial for individuals experiencing visual crowding or confusion.

Conclusions:

  • Computerized contrast sensitivity testing offers a more efficient and objective approach compared to traditional methods.
  • Objective psychophysical tasks are crucial for accurately assessing fundamental visual capabilities.
  • Tailoring testing methods, like single-target presentation, improves results for specific visual conditions.