Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synthetic circuits for cell ratio control.

Nature·2026
Same author

Manufacturing-aware generative models enable petascale synthesis of designed DNA.

Nature biotechnology·2026
Same author

Nutrient requirements of organ-specific metastasis in breast cancer.

Nature·2026
Same author

A Simple, Ultrastable, and Cost-Effective Oxygen-Scavenging System for Long-Term DNA-PAINT Imaging.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Engineered base editors with reduced bystander editing through directed evolution.

Nature biotechnology·2025
Same author

Plasmid2MC: efficient cell-free generation of high-purity minicircle DNA for genome editing in mammalian cells.

Communications biology·2025
Same journal

A practical low-cost setup for anesthesia of the fruit fly <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> in the classroom.

Journal of microbiology & biology education·2026
Same journal

Illuminating the "black boxes" of microbiome sequencing.

Journal of microbiology & biology education·2026
Same journal

MicroID Lab Guide: an open-source, customizable web application to guide students through unknown bacterial identification in undergraduate microbiology labs.

Journal of microbiology & biology education·2026
Same journal

ASM and a culture of sharing, caring, and fun in education.

Journal of microbiology & biology education·2026
Same journal

Using culturally responsive and sustaining course design to increase retention of underrepresented STEM undergraduates.

Journal of microbiology & biology education·2026
Same journal

Environmental load in biology classrooms: attention, technology, and cognitive access in science education.

Journal of microbiology & biology education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

Research, collaboration, and open science using web 2.0.

Kevin Shee1, Michael Strong, Nicholas J Guido

  • 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;

Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
|May 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Web 2.0 technologies enhance undergraduate research and education by facilitating collaboration and data sharing. Integrating tools like wikis and digital brainstorming improves project progress and learning outcomes in synthetic biology.

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study
07:50

Global and Current Research Trends of Single-Cell Sequencing in Cancer: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study

Published on: April 18, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology and Life Sciences
  • Educational Technology

Background:

  • The internet has revolutionized information access and global connectivity.
  • Web 2.0 technologies offer new opportunities for scientific research and education.
  • Adoption of these tools by scientists and educators varies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the benefits and challenges of integrating Web 2.0 applications into undergraduate research and education.
  • To share experiences from a synthetic biology summer research program at Harvard University.
  • To encourage the adoption of Web 2.0 technologies in academic settings.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized wiki-based documentation for project management.
  • Employed digital brainstorming tools for idea generation.
  • Implemented open data sharing via the web.
  • Applied these technologies within a summer undergraduate research program in synthetic biology.

Main Results:

  • Web 2.0 applications facilitated educational aspects of undergraduate research.
  • These technologies improved the collaborative progress of research projects.
  • Demonstrated successful integration of digital tools in a synthetic biology curriculum.

Conclusions:

  • Web 2.0 technologies are valuable tools for enhancing undergraduate research and education.
  • The discussed applications can foster greater collaboration and knowledge sharing.
  • Encouraging wider adoption can accelerate scientific discovery and learning.