Related Experiment Videos
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: for what benefit?
Hadrien Tranchart1, Serge Ketoff, Panagiotis Lainas
1Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart, France.
Summary
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is feasible but requires additional trocars and has a high rate of incisional hernias compared to classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Further research is needed to optimize SILC techniques.
Area of Science:
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) aims to improve outcomes over four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).
- Previous studies on SILC benefits are limited by small patient numbers and varied techniques.
- This study evaluates a standardized SILC approach against CLC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of a standardized single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).
- To assess operative time, complications, pain, quality of life, and cosmetic satisfaction.
Main Methods:
- Prospective data collection for 40 patients undergoing SILC and 37 patients undergoing CLC between June 2010 and January 2012.
- Utilized a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, quality of life, and cosmetic satisfaction.
- Compared operative and peri-operative data, including costs.
Main Results:
- SILC median operative time was 70 minutes; no conversions occurred, but 16 patients required an additional trocar.
- Four post-operative complications occurred exclusively in the SILC group, including two incisional hernias.
- Both groups showed similar surgical results, but SILC patients reported a median post-operative pain score of 5 (VAS).
Conclusions:
- Standardization of SILC is achievable.
- SILC is associated with a significant rate of additional trocar use.
- A notable rate of incisional hernias was observed following SILC, indicating a potential drawback.