Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Vision

Vision

Vision is the result of light being detected and transduced into neural signals by the retina of the eye. This information is then further analyzed and interpreted by the brain. First, light enters the front of the eye and is focused by the cornea and lens onto the retina—a thin sheet of neural tissue lining the back of the eye. Because of refraction through the convex lens of the eye, images are projected onto the retina upside-down and reversed.

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex

The cerebral cortex, the brain's outermost layer, is pivotal in processing complex cognitive tasks, emotions, and various sensory inputs and executing voluntary motor activities. This intricate structure is divided into three primary functional areas: the motor areas, sensory areas, and association areas.
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex.

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Latent subdimensions of anxiety and depression differentially influence exertion of effort in pursuit of reward versus avoidance of threat.

Translational psychiatry·2026

Same author

Neural signatures of model-based and model-free reinforcement learning across prefrontal cortex and striatum.

eLife·2026

Same author

Uncertainty for better and worse.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026

Same author

A sensorimotor instability drives a locomotor transition during fish development.

Science advances·2026

Same author

Dopamine dynamics in human anterior cingulate cortex during Pavlovian-instrumental conflict.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Modality-general sensitivity of pupil responses to regularity violations.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026

Same journal

Another 10 years of PLOS Computational Biology: A data-driven reflection on trends in genomics research.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

Mobility data resolution needed to inform predictive models of spatial epidemic spread from mobile phone data.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

DeepMethylation: A deep learning framework for tissue-specific DNA methylation prediction and functional variant annotation.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

Redefining and estimating the early-phase reproduction ratio for epidemic outbreaks in spatially structured populations.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

Optimized phenotype definitions boost GWAS power.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Sparse coding can predict primary visual cortex receptive field changes induced by abnormal visual input.

Jonathan J Hunt¹, Peter Dayan, Geoffrey J Goodhill

¹Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.

Plos Computational Biology

|May 16, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Sparse coding models explain visual receptive field development, even with abnormal visual input. This suggests sparsity drives early visual system development and can predict abnormal receptive field formation.

More Related Videos

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the Visual Cortex with Wide-View Retinotopic Stimulation

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the Visual Cortex with Wide-View Retinotopic Stimulation

Published on: December 8, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Topographical Estimation of Visual Population Receptive Fields by fMRI

Published on: February 3, 2015

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the Visual Cortex with Wide-View Retinotopic Stimulation

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the Visual Cortex with Wide-View Retinotopic Stimulation

Published on: December 8, 2023

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience
Computer Vision

Background:

Unsupervised learning of sparse representations yields receptive fields similar to primary visual cortex (V1) simple cells.
The precise drivers of in vivo receptive field development remain debated, with abnormal visual input providing key evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the role of sparsity in binocular receptive field development under abnormal visual rearing conditions.
To test the efficacy of sparse coding models in explaining experimentally observed receptive field changes.

Main Methods:

Applied three sparse coding models to simulate binocular receptive field development.
Utilized six distinct abnormal visual rearing conditions for model testing.
Designed a novel stimulus predicted to induce abnormal receptive fields based on sparsity principles.

Main Results:

All sparse coding models accurately predicted experimentally observed receptive field changes across all abnormal rearing conditions.
Confirmed that inter-ocular correlation asymmetries predict orientation-specific binocular receptive fields.
Identified a stimulus predicted to cause radical receptive field abnormalities during development.

Conclusions:

Early visual sensory development is strongly driven by an impetus towards sparsity.
Sparse coding provides a robust framework for understanding receptive field development, including responses to abnormal visual input.
The principle of sparsity can predict and potentially engineer abnormal visual development.