Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk Analysis Implications of Dose-Response Thresholds for NLRP3 Inflammasome-Mediated Diseases: Respirable Crystalline Silica and Lung Cancer as an Example.

Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society·2019
Same author

Socioeconomic and particulate air pollution correlates of heart disease risk.

Environmental research·2018
Same author

Biological mechanisms of non-linear dose-response for respirable mineral fibers.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2018
Same author

Effects of exposure estimation errors on estimated exposure-response relations for PM2.5.

Environmental research·2018
Same author

Applying Nonparametric Methods to Analyses of Short-Term Fine Particulate Matter Exposure and Hospital Admissions for Cardiovascular Diseases among Older Adults.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2017
Same author

Do causal concentration-response functions exist? A critical review of associational and causal relations between fine particulate matter and mortality.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2017
Same journal

Jack Fowle: Combining Values, Experience, and Teamwork to Improve Risk Analysis.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

A Hybrid FMEA-AHP Framework for Risk Prioritization in Nontransparent Artificial Intelligence Systems.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Trust-Building Communication for Extreme Heat Preparedness.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Spring Broken: A Risk Analysis of Fatal and Nonfatal Traffic Injuries in Florida.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Global Sensitivity Analysis of Societal Resilience Using Shapley Values and Polynomial Chaos Expansion.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Assessing How Fact-Checks Influence Accuracy and Consensus Judgments: Evidence From the Olympics.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Improving causal inferences in risk analysis.

Louis Anthony Tony Cox

    Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
    |May 31, 2013
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Objective, data-driven causal analysis methods can improve health risk assessments. These approaches reduce bias and increase the accuracy of health effects predictions from environmental exposures and interventions.

    Keywords:
    Accountability researchGranger testsair pollutioncausal graphscausal modelingcausalitychange-point analysiscounterfactual modelsintervention analysispanel data

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 11, 2026

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental Health
    • Epidemiology
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Current health effects risk assessments often rely on subjective expert judgments and unvalidated modeling assumptions.
    • These methods can lead to biased results, including false positives and inflated effect estimates, particularly in interpreting statistical associations.
    • There is a critical need for more objective and data-driven approaches in causal inference for public health.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the limitations of current subjective methods in health effects risk assessment.
    • To introduce and advocate for the use of objective, data-driven causal analysis methods.
    • To demonstrate how these methods can enhance the credibility and realism of causal claims regarding exposures and health outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing quasi-experimental designs to test and refute alternative (noncausal) explanations for observed associations.
    • Employing panel data studies to examine empirical relationships between changes in hypothesized causes and effects.
    • Applying intervention analysis, change-point analysis, Granger causality tests, conditional independence tests, counterfactual causality models, and causal graph models for robust causal inference.

    Main Results:

    • These data-driven methods allow for the testing of noncausal explanations, reducing bias in effect estimation.
    • Techniques like Granger causality and counterfactual models can quantify exposure-specific contributions to health responses, even with confounders.
    • Causal graph models facilitate the testing and refinement of mechanistic hypotheses using biomarker data.

    Conclusions:

    • Objective causal analysis methods offer a path to overcome pervasive false-positive biases in health effects research.
    • These methods can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of health risk assessments.
    • Adoption of these techniques has the potential to revolutionize the study of exposure-induced health effects and inform public health interventions more effectively.