Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Competition02:34

Competition

When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
Microbial Interactions: Competition01:26

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial competition is an ecological interaction in which microorganisms vie for limited resources within shared environments. These resources may include nutrients, space, or light, depending on the system. The intensity and outcome of competition are influenced by the environmental context, such as nutrient availability, spatial constraints, and the diversity of microbial species present. These competitive interactions significantly influence the structure, function, and resilience of...
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Connecting the dots - recognition of artificial and natural shapes relies on representing points of high information.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Material fingerprinting: predicting human perception of material appearance through psychophysical analysis and neural networks.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Core dimensions of human material perception.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Moving spiders do not boost visual search in spider fear.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Perceptual plausibility of exaggerated realistic motion.

Cognition·2024
Same author

Perceptual dimensions of wood materials.

Journal of vision·2024
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays
10:37

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays

Published on: October 8, 2015

Grouping principles in direct competition.

Filipp Schmidt1, Thomas Schmidt

  • 1University of Kaiserslautern, Social Sciences, Experimental Psychology, Erwin-Schrödinger-Str. Geb. 57, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany. filipp.schmidt@sowi.uni-kl.de

Vision Research
|June 15, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new primed flanker task to measure perceptual grouping. Stronger grouping in targets slowed responses, while prime grouping boosted motor responses, revealing differences in visual processing.

Keywords:
Grouping by brightnessGrouping by shapeGrouping by sizePerceptual groupingResponse priming

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays
10:37

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays

Published on: October 8, 2015

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Understanding perceptual grouping is crucial for visual processing.
  • Existing methods often lack objectivity or direct measurement of visuomotor efficiency.
  • Rapid processing of visual cues influences motor responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce and validate the primed flanker task for measuring perceptual grouping.
  • Compare the efficiency of different grouping cues (brightness, shape, size) in rapid visuomotor processing.
  • Investigate the influence of subjective grouping strength on response times and priming effects.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a primed flanker task with varying stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs).
  • Manipulated grouping cues (brightness/shape, brightness/size) between primes and targets.
  • Measured response times, error rates, and priming effects as indicators of visual feedforward processing.

Main Results:

  • Stronger target grouping increased overall response times.
  • Stronger prime grouping enhanced priming effects in motor responses.
  • Discrepancies observed between rapid visuomotor processing and subjective impression for brightness/shape cues, but not brightness/size.

Conclusions:

  • The primed flanker task provides an objective measure of speeded visuomotor processing of grouping cues.
  • Different grouping cues exhibit varying efficiencies in feedforward visual processing.
  • The task is valuable for comparative studies of base groupings and their influence on visuomotor behavior.