Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Corrigendum to "Eye movements of younger and older adults decrease during story listening in background noise" [Hearing Research 468 (2025) 109447].

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Not All Rules Are Equal: Rare Conditional Rules Shape Behaviour but Yield to Global Probability in Passive Listening.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Voluntary Attention Selectively Modulates Omission Responses.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

The Impact of Action Intention Versus Action-Effect Intention on Auditory Prediction Error Signals.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Neural Correlates of Dynamic Predictions and Prediction Errors in Response to Unexpected Silence and Sound.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Predictable changes within fast-paced sound sequences do not elicit the mismatch negativity: A conceptual in-class replication study.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Object-related regularities are processed automatically: evidence from the visual mismatch negativity.

Dagmar Müller1, Andreas Widmann, Erich Schröger

  • 1Institut für Psychologie, Universität Leipzig Leipzig, Germany.

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
|June 18, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Visual object formation can occur automatically, even for unattended stimuli. This study used behavioral measures and visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) to show pre-attentive object structuring.

Keywords:
deviance detectionhuman ERPobject formationprediction errorvariable resolution electromagnetic tomography (VARETA)visual mismatch negativity

More Related Videos

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns
09:42

Stimulus-specific Cortical Visual Evoked Potential Morphological Patterns

Published on: May 12, 2019

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
05:38

Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology

Published on: June 29, 2021

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • The formation of visual objects from sensory input is a complex process.
  • A key debate concerns whether visual object formation requires attention or can occur pre-attentively.
  • Previous implicit behavioral measures suggest pre-attentive object formation is possible.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate pre-attentive visual object formation.
  • To determine if the visual system automatically structures task-irrelevant information into objects.
  • To combine behavioral measures with electrophysiological indicators (vMMN).

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a luminance discrimination task on targets presented on ellipses (objects).
  • Stimuli included standard and deviant assignments of targets to objects, defined by task-irrelevant relationships.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral responses were recorded; vMMN was analyzed and localized using VARETA.

Main Results:

  • Task-irrelevant deviations in target-to-object assignment led to increased reaction times, despite participants not noticing the deviations.
  • Deviating assignments elicited a visual mismatch negativity (vMMN) between 246-280 ms over posterio-temporal areas.
  • VARETA localized the object-related vMMN to the inferior temporal gyrus.

Conclusions:

  • The visual system automatically structures incoming information into coherent objects, even when aspects are task-irrelevant.
  • Pre-attentive object formation is supported by both behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
  • This automatic structuring occurs independently of conscious awareness or task relevance.