Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026
Step By Step: Microsurgical training method combining two nonliving animal models
Published on: May 9, 2015
Simple cost analysis of a rural dental training facility in Australia
1Rural, Remote and Indigenous Oral Health, School of Dentistry and Oral Health and Population and Social Health Research Program, Griffith Health Institute, Queensland, Australia. r.lalloo@griffith.edu.au
Introduction:
Student clinical placements away from the university dental school clinics are an integral component of dental training programs. In 2009, the School of Dentistry and Oral Health, Griffith University, commenced a clinical placement in a remote rural community in Australia. This paper presents a simple cost analysis of the project from mid-2008 to mid-2011.
Methods:
All expenditures of the project are audited by the Financial and Planning Services unit of the university. The budget was divided into capital and operational costs, and the latter were further subdivided into salary and non-salary costs, and these were further analysed for the various types of expenditures incurred. The value of the treatments provided and income generated is also presented.
Results:
Remote rural placements have additional (to the usual university dental clinic) costs in terms of salary incentives, travel, accommodation and subsistence support. However, the benefits of the placement to both the students and the local community might outweigh the additional costs of the placement.
Conclusions And Implications:
Because of high costs of rural student clinical placements, the financial support of partners, including the local Shire Council, state/territory and Commonwealth governments, is crucial in the establishment and ongoing sustainability of rural dental student clinical placements.
