Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026

Measurement of Tumor T2* Relaxation Times after Iron Oxide Nanoparticle Administration
Published on: May 19, 2023
Magnetic susceptibility as a B0 field strength independent MRI biomarker of liver iron overload
Diego Hernando1, Rachel J Cook, Carol Diamond
1Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Purpose:
MR-based quantification of liver magnetic susceptibility may enable field strength-independent measurement of liver iron concentration (LIC). However, susceptibility quantification is challenging, due to nonlocal effects of susceptibility on the B0 field. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate feasibility of susceptibility-based LIC quantification using a fat-referenced approach.
Methods:
Phantoms consisting of vials with increasing iron concentrations immersed between oil/water layers, and 27 subjects (9 controls/18 subjects with liver iron overload) were scanned. Ferriscan (1.5 T) provided R2-based reference LIC. Multiecho three-dimensional-SPGR (1.5 T/3 T) enabled fat-water, B0- and R2*-mapping. Phantom iron concentration (mg Fe L(-1)) was estimated from B0 differences (ΔB0) between vials and neighboring oil. Liver susceptibility and LIC (mg Fe g(-1) dry tissue) was estimated from ΔB0 between the lateral right lobe of the liver and adjacent subcutaneous adipose tissue.
Results:
Estimated phantom iron concentrations had good correlation with true iron concentrations (1.5 T:slope = 0.86, intercept = 0.72, r(2) = 0.98; 3 T:slope = 0.85, intercept = 1.73, r(2) = 0.98). In liver, ΔB0 correlated strongly with R2* (1.5 T:r(2) = 0.86; 3 T:r(2) = 0.93) and B0-LIC had good agreement with Ferriscan-LIC (slopes/intercepts nearly 1.0/0.0, 1.5 T:r(2) = 0.67, slope = 0.93 ± 0.13, P ≈ 0.50, intercept = 1.93 ± 0.78, P ≈ 0.02; 3 T:r(2) = 0.84, slope = 1.01 ± 0.09, P ≈ 0.90, intercept = 0.23 ± 0.52, P ≈ 0.68).
Discussion:
Fat-referenced, susceptibility-based LIC estimation is feasible at both field strengths. This approach may enable improved susceptibility mapping in the abdomen.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
Ferromagnetism
Diamagnetic Shielding of Nuclei: Local Diamagnetic Current
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

