Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026
Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
Quality metrics in neonatal and pediatric critical care transport: a consensus statement
Michael T Bigham1, Hamilton P Schwartz,
1Department of Pediatrics, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, OH, USA. mbigham@chmca.org
Insights
Consensus was reached on 23 quality metrics for neonatal and pediatric patient transport, establishing a foundation for benchmarking and improving care quality during transfers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric critical care
- Neonatal transport medicine
- Healthcare quality improvement
Background:
- Neonatal and pediatric patient transport to specialized centers requires quality monitoring.
- Standardized language is crucial for comparing transport program outcomes.
- No consensus existed on quality metrics for transport teams.
Framework:
- Metrics categorized by Institute of Medicine quality domains (effectiveness, safety) and Donabedian's structure/process/outcome framework.
- Utilized nominal group technique for consensus building.
Implementation:
- A two-day statewide conference involved 19 leaders from six neonatal/pediatric specialty programs.
- Literature review and existing program data identified 257 candidate metrics, refined to 70, then 23 final metrics.
Implications:
- Established 23 consensus-based quality metrics for neonatal and pediatric transport.
- Provides a foundation for benchmarking transport programs and driving quality improvement initiatives.
- Defined metrics ensure consistency and comparability across institutions.
Objectives:
The transport of neonatal and pediatric patients to tertiary care medical centers for specialized care demands monitoring the quality of care delivered during transport and its impact on patient outcomes. Accurate assessment of quality indicators and patient outcomes requires the use of a standard language permitting comparisons among transport programs. No consensus exists on a set of quality metrics for benchmarking transport teams. The aim of this project was to achieve consensus on appropriate neonatal and pediatric transport quality metrics.
Design:
Candidate quality metrics were identified through literature review and those metrics currently tracked by each program. Consensus was governed by nominal group technique. Metrics were categorized in two dimensions: Institute of Medicine quality domains and Donabedian's structure/process/outcome framework.
Setting:
Two-day Ohio statewide quality metrics conference.
Subjects:
Nineteen transport leaders and staff representing six statewide neonatal/pediatric specialty programs convened to achieve consensus.
Measurement And Main Results:
Two hundred fifty-seven performance metrics relevant to neonatal/pediatric transport were identified. Eliminating duplicate and overlapping metrics resulted in 70 candidate metrics. Nominal group methodology yielded 23 final quality metrics, the largest portion representing Donabedian's outcome category (n = 12, 52%) and the Institute of Medicine quality domains of effectiveness (n = 7, 30%) and safety (n = 9, 39%). Sample final metrics include measurement of family presence, pain management, intubation success, neonatal temperature control, use of lights and sirens, and medication errors. Lastly, a definition for each metric was established and agreed upon for consistency among institutions.
Conclusions:
This project demonstrates that quality metrics can be achieved through consensus building and provides the foundation for benchmarking among neonatal and pediatric transport programs and quality improvement projects.
More Related Videos
05:50International Expert Consensus and Recommendations for Neonatal Pneumothorax Ultrasound Diagnosis and Ultrasound-guided Thoracentesis Procedure
Published on: March 12, 2020
11:27A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
01:19Standards of Care II
01:22Standards of Care I
01:29Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
01:19Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.