Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Phase III trials of targeted anticancer therapies: redesigning the concept
Alberto Ocana1, Eitan Amir, Francisco Vera-Badillo
1Authors' Affiliation: Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract:
Randomized phase III trials provide the gold-standard evidence for the approval of new drugs: an experimental treatment is compared with the current standard of care to identify clinically relevant differences in a predefined endpoint. However, there are several problems relating to the current role of phase III trials in drug development including the limited clinical benefit observed for some approved agents, the necessity for large trials to detect these differences, the inability of such trials to identify rare but important toxicities, and high cost. The design of phase III trials evaluating drug combinations, and those including biomarkers, presents additional challenges. Here, we review these problems and suggest that phase III trials with adaptive designs in selected prescreened populations could reduce these limitations.
Insights
Phase III trials are crucial for drug approval but face challenges like limited benefits and high costs. Adaptive designs in prescreened populations may offer solutions for more efficient clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Clinical pharmacology
- Drug development
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Randomized phase III trials are the gold standard for new drug approval.
- Current phase III trials face limitations including small observed clinical benefits, large sample size requirements, and high costs.
- Challenges exist in designing trials for drug combinations and biomarker-driven studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the limitations of current phase III trial designs in drug development.
- To propose adaptive designs in selected populations as a potential solution.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and common challenges in phase III trial design.
- Discussion of the potential benefits of adaptive designs and prescreening.
Main Results:
- Phase III trials often show limited clinical benefit for new drugs.
- Identifying rare toxicities and evaluating drug combinations/biomarkers pose design challenges.
- Adaptive designs in prescreened populations are suggested to mitigate limitations.
Conclusions:
- Current phase III trial designs have inherent limitations impacting drug development efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
- Adaptive phase III trial designs in selected, prescreened populations offer a promising approach to address these challenges and improve drug evaluation.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Clinical Trials: Overview

