Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
Mean Absolute Deviation01:13

Mean Absolute Deviation

The mean absolute deviation is also a measure of the variability of data in a sample. It is the absolute value of the average difference between the data values and the mean.
Let us consider a dataset containing the number of unsold cupcakes in five shops: 10, 15, 8, 7, and 10. Initially, calculate the sample mean. Then calculate the deviation, or the difference, between each data value and the mean. Next, the absolute values of these deviations are added and divided by the sample size to...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The influence of action execution on end-state comfort and underlying movement kinematics: An examination of right and left handed participants.

Acta psychologica·2015
Same author

Absolute error.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Measuring change in motor memory.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Closed-loop control of a ballistic response.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Measuring change.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Spatial cues in memory for movement.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

Absolute error.

R W Schutz1, E A Roy

  • 1a School of Physical Education and Recreation , The University of British Columbia.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|August 22, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study clarifies performance error measures: algebraic error (CE), absolute error (AE), and within-subject variance (VE). It demonstrates AE is predictable from CE and VE, offering clearer statistical definitions for research.

More Related Videos

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones (ViMAS): A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones (ViMAS): A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones (ViMAS): A Pilot Study
07:51

Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones (ViMAS): A Pilot Study

Published on: March 14, 2017

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening
05:36

Subjective Refraction Test Using a Smartphone for Vision Screening

Published on: October 18, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Motor Control and Learning
  • Quantitative Psychology
  • Educational Measurement

Background:

  • Performance analysis in motor learning often relies on error metrics.
  • Existing measures like algebraic error (CE), absolute error (AE), and within-subject variance (VE) lack unambiguous statistical definitions.
  • Misinterpretation of these variables can lead to flawed conclusions in research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-examine and clarify the statistical and logical meanings of CE, AE, and VE.
  • To establish unambiguous definitions for these key performance variables.
  • To provide a framework for accurate interpretation of research findings related to motor performance.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical re-examination of the relationships between CE, AE, and VE.
  • Analysis under the assumption of a normal distribution for performance data.
  • Illustrative examples to demonstrate potential misinterpretations of AE.

Main Results:

  • Absolute error (AE) is statistically dependent on and predictable from algebraic error (CE) and within-subject variance (VE).
  • The information conveyed by AE is fully contained within CE and VE, depending on their ratio.
  • Specific conditions (CE/VE ratio) dictate whether CE, VE, or a combination of both best represents the error information.

Conclusions:

  • AE provides no unique information beyond that contained in CE and VE.
  • Understanding the interplay between CE and VE is crucial for accurate performance error assessment.
  • This research offers a more precise statistical foundation for interpreting motor performance data.