Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Transient and Steady-state Response01:24

Transient and Steady-state Response

In control systems, test signals are essential for evaluating performance under various conditions. The ramp function is effective for systems undergoing gradual changes, while the step function is suitable for assessing systems facing sudden disturbances. For systems subjected to shock inputs, the impulse function is the most appropriate test signal.
These test signals are integral in designing control systems to exhibit two key performance aspects: transient response and steady-state response.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The serial-position effect in short-term motor retention.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Further tests of adams' closed-loop theory.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

A note on motor learning without post-response knowledge of results.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

The activity-set hypothesis for warm-up decrement in a movement-speed task.

Journal of motor behavior·2013
Same author

Diminishing the effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results on generalized motor program learning.

Journal of motor behavior·2009
Same author

The effect of knowledge of results delay and the subjective estimation of movement form on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·1997
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

Preparatory set, response complexity, and reaction latency.

C A Wrisberg1, M H Pushkin

  • 1a Division of Health, Physical Education, and Recreation , Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universtiy.

Journal of Motor Behavior
|August 23, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study found that focusing on movement preparation (motor set) shortened reaction times (RTs) for simple arm movements. Complex movements showed no significant difference between motor and sensory set preparation.

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
09:43

The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents

Published on: August 10, 2014

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Motor control and human movement science.
  • Cognitive neuroscience and psychomotor performance.

Background:

  • Reaction time (RT) is a key measure in understanding motor control.
  • The influence of preparatory set on motor performance is a significant area of research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interaction between preparatory set and response complexity in discrete arm movements.
  • To examine how different preparatory sets (motor vs. sensory) affect reaction latency.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects performed simple and complex discrete horizontal arm movements.
  • Two preparatory set conditions were enforced: motor set (attending to response) and sensory set (attending to stimulus).
  • Reaction latency was measured following initial reaction-time (RT) trials.

Main Results:

  • For simple arm movements, an enforced motor set significantly reduced RT compared to an enforced sensory set.
  • No significant difference in RT was observed for complex arm movements between the two preparatory set conditions.
  • This suggests preparatory set interacts with response complexity.

Conclusions:

  • Motor set is more effective in reducing reaction time for simple movements.
  • The benefits of motor set diminish with increasing response complexity.
  • Findings have implications for theories of neuromotor reaction, such as Henry's memory drum theory.