Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026
10:22
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Category-specific uncertainty modeling in clinical laboratory measurement processes
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
|August 24, 2013
Summary
This study introduces a structured methodology for measurement uncertainty modeling in clinical assays. Developing category-specific frameworks simplifies generating accurate uncertainty models for diverse laboratory tests.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Measurement uncertainty statements are crucial for assessing clinical assay quality.
- Uncertainty models aid in evaluating and optimizing laboratory protocols to minimize assay uncertainty.
- A systematic methodology for uncertainty modeling is proposed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a structured methodology for clinical assay uncertainty modeling.
- To demonstrate that uncertainty models within assay categories share structural identity.
- To identify and list assay-specific parameters within a general framework.
Main Methods:
- Classified clinical laboratory assays by chemical reaction and analysis methodology.
- Developed uncertainty models for substrate assays (optical absorbance) and ion selective electrode (ISE) assays (potentiometric measurements).
- Established general mathematical frameworks for uncertainty models within each assay category.
Main Results:
- General mathematical frameworks for uncertainty models were developed for substrate and ISE assays.
- Parameters that vary between assays within each category were identified.
- The developed models were validated against quality control data.
Conclusions:
- A general modeling framework for each assay category is sufficient for generating assay-specific uncertainty models.
- This approach simplifies and structures the process of uncertainty modeling in clinical laboratories.
- The methodology allows for efficient evaluation and optimization of laboratory protocols.
Related Concept Videos
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
02:46Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
00:59Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
01:10Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...