Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Influence of degree of learning on rate of forgetting of tonal sequences.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same author

Oxyberberine protects middle cerebral artery occlusion triggered cerebral injury through TLR4/NLRP3 pathway in rats.

Journal of chemical neuroanatomy·2024
Same author

Assessing long-term forgetting: A pragmatic approach.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2023
Same author

Rate of forgetting is independent from initial degree of learning across different age groups.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2022
Same author

Forgetting rates of gist and peripheral episodic details in prose recall.

Memory & cognition·2022
Same author

Rate of forgetting is independent of initial degree of learning.

Memory & cognition·2022
Same journal

EXPRESS: When illusion rivals reality. Investigating error detection and the role of working memory resources in the Vanishing Ball Illusion.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Metaphors and the Body: Perceived Locations for the Self are Influenced by Conceptual Metaphor.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
14:24

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

Published on: July 29, 2025

Raven's matrices and working memory: a dual-task approach.

K Venkata Rao1, Alan Baddeley

  • 1a Department of Psychology , University of York , York , UK.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|August 29, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The concurrent task method reveals the central executive is crucial for Raven's Matrices performance, but the phonological loop is not involved. This technique offers new insights into general intelligence testing.

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze
14:24

An Appetitive Spatial Working Memory Task for Mice in a Semi-Automated 8-Arm Radial Maze, Reducing Fearful Memory Association in the Maze

Published on: July 29, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychometrics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Raven's Matrices Test is a key measure of general intelligence (g).
  • Previous research linked performance to working memory, particularly the central executive.
  • Existing studies primarily used correlational analyses of correct solutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cognitive processes underlying Raven's Matrices performance.
  • To apply the concurrent task methodology to analyze working memory's role.
  • To differentiate the involvement of central executive and phonological loop components.

Main Methods:

  • Participants solved Raven's Matrices under baseline and concurrent task conditions.
  • Concurrent tasks included backward counting (disrupting central executive) and verbal repetition (disrupting phonological loop).
  • Performance was assessed by solution accuracy and solution time.

Main Results:

  • Solution accuracy showed minimal impact from concurrent tasks.
  • Solution time data strongly supported a significant role for the central executive.
  • No evidence indicated involvement of the phonological loop in task performance.

Conclusions:

  • The concurrent task methodology provides clear evidence for central executive involvement in Raven's Matrices.
  • This method offers a promising approach for analyzing cognitive processes in psychometric tests.
  • Future research can utilize concurrent tasks to further dissect general intelligence components.