Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Rasch's Logistic Model Applied to Growth.

Journal of applied measurement·2020

Same author

Measuring Genuine Progress: An Example from the UN Millennium Development Goals.

Journal of applied measurement·2019

Same author

Loevinger on Unidimensional Tests with Reference to Guttman, Rasch, and Wright.

Journal of applied measurement·2019

Same author

Measurement of patient-reported outcomes. 1: The search for the Holy Grail.

Journal of medical economics·2018

Same author

Theory-based metrological traceability in education: A reading measurement network.

Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation·2016

Same author

Commentary.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2016

Same journal

Characterizing facilitators and barriers to Hypoglycemic Confidence among patients with diabetes: a qualitative descriptive study.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

Psychometric evaluation and refinement of the 7DHW questionnaire for the German population.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

Editorial: Ethical leadership and workplace equity: mediating and moderating mechanisms in emotional labor and well-being.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

How organizational support promotes teacher professional recognition: a perspective on teachers' autonomous learning and teaching abilities.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

From "performance competition arena" to "psychological exemption zone": psychological safety mechanisms in reverse mobility.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

Same journal

General and sport-specific mental toughness in university students: associations with personality traits and physical activity.

Frontiers in psychology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 8, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Causal Rasch models.

A Jackson Stenner¹, William P Fisher, Mark H Stone

¹MetaMetrics Inc. Durham, NC, USA ; School of Education, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Frontiers in Psychology

|August 30, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Rasch models integrate substantive theory for measurable outcomes. Causal Rasch models use experimental manipulation to test quantitative hypotheses, validating predictions against observations for robust measurement.

Keywords:

Rasch models assessment causality construct validity models prediction quantification reading ability

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 8, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Area of Science:

Measurement theory
Educational psychology
Psychometrics

Background:

Rasch unidimensional models link measures of objects, mechanisms, and outcomes.
Substantive theory guides interventions to maintain constant observed outcomes.
Rasch analysis without construct theory can be a 'black box', limiting understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore the integration of Rasch models with substantive theory for causal inference.
To test a quantitative hypothesis by comparing theoretical trade-offs with observed data.
To establish the utility of experimental manipulation in validating Rasch models.

Main Methods:

Developing a causal Rasch model incorporating experimental interventions.
Manipulating reader ability, text complexity, or both simultaneously.
Comparing predicted outcomes with observed outcomes (e.g., counts correct).

Main Results:

The study proposes a framework for causal Rasch modeling through experimental manipulation.
Successful prediction of outcomes based on interventions supports the quantitative hypothesis.
Integration with substantive theory enhances the interpretability and validity of Rasch analysis.

Conclusions:

Causal Rasch models, validated by experimental manipulation, offer deeper insights than descriptive fitting.
The quantitative hypothesis is sustained when model predictions align with observations under intervention.
This approach moves beyond algebraic manipulation to empirically test measurement theories.