Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Potential Economic Value of Multi-cancer Early Detection Testing Under Differential Cost Trends for Cancer Screening and Management.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2025
Same author

Impact of Population Cancer Risk on the Cost-effectiveness of Multicancer Early Detection Testing in the United States.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2025
Same author

Estimated proportion of cancer deaths not addressed by current cancer screening efforts in the United States.

Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers·2025
Same author

Budget impact analyses of hemoglobin A1c and lipid panel point-of-care testing with Afinion™ 2 in Canada and Italy.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2025
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of a multicancer early detection test in the US.

The American journal of managed care·2025
Same author

A cost-effectiveness analysis of avelumab plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone as first-line maintenance treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan.

Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Modeling hard clinical end-point data in economic analyses.

Anuraag R Kansal1, Ying Zheng, Roberto Palencia

  • 1Evidera, Bethesda , MD , USA.

Journal of Medical Economics
|September 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Health economic models using hard clinical end-point data should adapt their approach based on event frequency. Simple models suffice for low-risk events, while complex models are needed for high-risk events in cardiovascular disease and cancer.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Clinical trial analysis
  • Pharmacoeconomics

Background:

  • Increasing availability of hard clinical end-point data (e.g., cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes) fuels interest in their use for economic analyses.
  • Evaluating the suitability of existing modeling approaches for health economic models is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate published methods for modeling hard end-points from clinical trials.
  • To assess the applicability of these methods in health economic models with diverse disease characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of cost-effectiveness models in cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and chronic lower respiratory diseases.
  • Inclusion of studies using hard end-point data from randomized clinical trials.
  • Summarization and evaluation of clinical input characteristics and modeling approaches.

Main Results:

  • 33 articles analyzed (23 CV, 8 cancer, 2 respiratory) utilized decision trees, Markov models, discrete event simulations, or hybrid approaches.
  • Event rates were modeled as constant, time-dependent, or patient-specific.
  • Time/patient-dependent risks were employed for major event rates >1%/year in simpler models (<7 health states); constant rates were preferred for infrequent events or complex models.

Conclusions:

  • Model complexity and event rate modeling should align with clinical event frequency and characteristics.
  • Simplified modeling is suitable for low-risk events.
  • Detailed approaches (e.g., individual simulations, time-dependent rates) are better for common, high-risk events in populations like those with cardiovascular disease.