Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating diagnostic tests with imperfect standards.

P N Valenstein1

  • 1Department of Pathology, State University of New York, Stony Brook.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Six-year trends in productivity and utilization of 73 clinical laboratories: a College of American Pathologists Laboratory Management Index Program study.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2001
Same author

Interinstitutional variation in glycohemoglobin monitoring and glycemic control of diabetic patients.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2001
Same author

Employee competence and performance-based assessment: A college of American pathologists Q-probes study of larboratory personnel in 522 institutions.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2000
Same author

Gynecologic cytology turnaround time. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 371 laboratories.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1999
Same author

Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Annals of internal medicine·1996
Same author

Ordering accuracy. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 577 institutions.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·1995
Same journal

Invasive urothelial carcinoma in association with surface low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: clinical and pathologic insights from a rare entity.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

CEACAM1 expression by immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive multicriteria life cycle assessment of biopsy processing in a surgical pathology department.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic significance of Myb protein and its downstream target genes in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Mismatch repair protein "nonclassic expression loss" pattern in colorectal cancer: an important staining pattern that is not well understood.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain in medical laboratory personnel: a cross-sectional study.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
See all related articles

Evaluating new diagnostic tests using imperfect gold standards distorts performance measures. These predictable biases can be significant, even with highly accurate standards, impacting clinical test accuracy reporting.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology

Background:

  • Diagnostic tests are crucial for disease identification and management.
  • Gold standards are typically used to validate new diagnostic tests.
  • Gold standards are often assumed to be perfectly accurate, but can misclassify patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of imperfect gold standards on diagnostic test performance measures.
  • To highlight the predictable biases introduced by using flawed gold standards.
  • To suggest methods for minimizing these distortions in test evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of diagnostic accuracy metrics under imperfect gold standard conditions.
  • Examination of bias direction and magnitude in common performance measures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of strategies to mitigate evaluation distortions.

    • Main Results:

    • Imperfect gold standards introduce predictable biases into commonly used diagnostic test performance measures.
    • These distortions can be substantial, even when the gold standard is highly accurate.
    • Standard performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) are significantly affected.

    Conclusions:

    • The use of imperfect gold standards can lead to inaccurate reporting of diagnostic test performance.
    • Awareness of these biases is critical for accurate interpretation of test evaluation studies.
    • Implementing specific approaches can help minimize distortions and improve the reliability of diagnostic test assessments.