Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview01:03

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

5.2K
Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...
5.2K
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity01:25

Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity

10.2K
Drugs exert their therapeutic effects by interacting with receptors, enzymes, or ion channels that are present throughout the human body. The strength and duration of the interaction between a drug and its target receptor are characterized by the selectivity and specificity of the drug. Selectivity refers to a drug's strong preference for its intended target over other targets. For instance, isoprenaline, a non-selective β-adrenergic agonist, interacts with both β1- and...
10.2K
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy01:22

Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy

6.9K
The potency of a drug is the measure of its ability to produce a biological response and can be compared by looking at the half-maximum effective concentration or EC50 values of different drugs. A lower EC50 value indicates higher potency of the drug. In the dose–response curve of two antihypertensive drugs, candesartan and irbesartan, a significant difference is observed in their EC50 values. A lower EC50 value for candesartan indicates that it is more potent than irbesartan, as it...
6.9K
Response Surface Methodology01:16

Response Surface Methodology

910
Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
910
Cross-reactivity00:42

Cross-reactivity

28.8K
Overview
28.8K
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

394
The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
394

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

Mental health in challenging situations: how experienced agency affects coping and mental distress.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Agents' awareness of visuo-motor incongruency determines changes in haptic sensitivity.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Response activation in error processing: Assessing leakage into upcoming action episodes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Binding continuous response features of extended movements: Integration with discrete response but not stimulus features.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Playing With Matches: Preparatory Cognitive Processing Shapes Affective Evaluation.

Journal of cognition·2026
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 7, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.3K

Joint response-effect compatibility.

Roland Pfister1, Thomas Dolk, Wolfgang Prinz

  • 1Julius Maximilians University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, roland.pfister@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|October 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

When performing joint actions, individuals may adopt their coactor's response-effect (R-E) contingencies. This study found that R-E compatibility effects emerged in joint tasks but not in isolation, influencing motor control.

More Related Videos

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
06:57

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

11.0K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 7, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

10.3K
Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
06:57

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE

Published on: May 14, 2019

11.0K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Neuroscience
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Joint action research typically focuses on representing a coactor's stimulus-response assignments.
  • The role of representing a coactor's response-effect (R-E) contingencies in joint action is less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether a coactor's response-effect (R-E) contingencies influence an individual's motor control during joint action.
  • To determine if R-E compatibility effects, observed in individual action, are modulated in a joint task setting.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a response-effect (R-E) compatibility task, involving keypresses producing spatially compatible or incompatible action effects.
  • The R-E compatibility task was conducted both in isolation (individual go-no-go) and in a joint setting with a coactor.

Main Results:

  • No significant R-E compatibility effects were observed when the task was performed in isolation.
  • Small but reliable R-E compatibility effects emerged when the same task was performed in a joint setting.
  • These findings suggest that knowledge of a coactor's R-E contingencies can impact self-produced action effect utilization.

Conclusions:

  • Representing a coactor's response-effect (R-E) contingencies appears to influence motor control in joint action.
  • This extends previous models of joint action by highlighting the importance of shared R-E contingency knowledge.
  • Future research should explore the mechanisms underlying the adoption and influence of coactor R-E contingencies.