Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Calvarial Model of Bone Augmentation in Rabbit for Assessment of Bone Growth and Neovascularization in Bone Substitution Materials
Published on: August 13, 2019
Injectable biphasic calcium phosphate cements as a potential bone substitute
Kemal Sariibrahimoglu1, Joop G C Wolke, Sander C G Leeuwenburgh
1Department of Biomaterials, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Researchers explored a new type of bone cement made from a mix of two forms of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) to improve its ability to degrade in the body. Traditional apatitic calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) are good for bone growth but don’t break down quickly enough in large defects. The team created biphasic cements using both α- and β-TCP, which they found increased degradation rates in tests. They observed that higher β-TCP content led to faster dissolution and calcium release, suggesting better resorption. The cements also had different crystal shapes compared to monophasic ones. These findings suggest that biphasic cements could be more effective for bone repair by balancing degradation with structural support.
Area of Science:
- Bioceramics in regenerative medicine
- Orthopedic biomaterials development
- Calcium phosphate cement formulation
Background:
Bone graft materials must balance osteoconductivity with controlled degradation. While apatitic calcium phosphate cements (CPCs) offer strong bone integration, their limited degradation hinders effectiveness in large defects. Earlier studies established apatitic CPCs as osteoconductive but insufficiently resorbable. This gap motivated investigation into modifying CPC composition to improve degradation without sacrificing structural properties. Prior research has shown that tricalcium phosphate (TCP) exists in α- and β-polymorphic forms with differing solubility. However, no prior work had resolved how combining these phases affects cement behavior. Researchers needed to determine if biphasic TCP could enhance degradation while maintaining injectability and mechanical stability. This uncertainty drove the current study to explore biphasic formulations as a potential solution.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aimed to develop and evaluate biphasic calcium phosphate cements (BCPCs) using α/β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP) as a precursor. The goal was to improve the degradation properties of traditional apatitic CPCs while maintaining injectability and mechanical performance. Researchers focused on how varying α/β-TCP ratios influence cement characteristics. They hypothesized that biphasic compositions could enhance resorption rates without compromising structural integrity. The specific problem addressed was the insufficient degradation of monophasic apatitic CPCs in large bone defects. The motivation stemmed from clinical needs for graft materials that degrade in sync with new bone formation. By manipulating precursor phase ratios, the team sought to optimize both osteoconductivity and resorption dynamics.
Main Methods:
The study involved heat treatment of commercial α-TCP powder to generate biphasic α/β-TCP powders with varying ratios. These powders were used as precursors for cement formulation. Researchers measured setting time, injectability, and mechanical properties of the resulting BCPCs. In vitro degradation was assessed using dissolution tests and calcium release analysis. Morphological differences between monophasic and biphasic cements were observed using crystal structure analysis. The team compared BCPCs with standard monophasic α-TCP-based CPCs. They evaluated how β-TCP content affected apatite formation during cement hardening. The approach combined material synthesis with mechanical and degradation testing to assess functional performance.
Main Results:
Heat treatment of α-TCP produced biphasic powders with controllable α/β-TCP ratios. BCPCs showed increased setting and injectability times compared to monophasic cements. As β-TCP content increased, apatite formation during hardening decreased. Morphologically, monophasic cements formed plate-like crystals, while BCPCs exhibited needle-like structures. In vitro dissolution rates rose significantly with higher β-TCP content. Calcium release from BCPCs increased proportionally with β-TCP levels. These findings suggest that biphasic compositions enhance degradation without compromising injectability. The results indicate that α/β-TCP mixtures can render apatitic CPCs more resorbable while maintaining structural properties.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that biphasic α/β-TCP cements can improve degradation rates of apatitic CPCs. Their findings suggest that β-TCP content directly influences dissolution and calcium release. The needle-like crystal morphology of BCPCs may affect mechanical behavior differently than plate-like structures. The study shows that varying precursor phase ratios allows tuning of cement properties. The observed increase in injectability time with biphasic compositions suggests a trade-off between workability and degradation. These results imply that BCPCs could better match bone regeneration timelines than monophasic cements. The authors propose that this approach offers a practical way to enhance CPC performance for clinical applications. Their findings suggest that biphasic formulations may address current limitations in large bone defect repair.
Frequently Asked Questions
Biphasic cements with higher β-TCP content showed increased dissolution rates and calcium release in vitro, suggesting enhanced resorption compared to monophasic apatitic cements.
Monophasic cements formed plate-like crystals, while biphasic cements exhibited needle-like structures, indicating morphological changes with precursor composition.
Higher β-TCP content increases dissolution rates and calcium release, which the authors propose could improve degradation in vivo compared to monophasic apatitic cements.
The study found that apatite formation during hardening decreased with increasing β-TCP content in biphasic precursor powders.
BCPCs showed increased injectability times compared to monophasic cements, suggesting a trade-off between workability and degradation properties.
The authors suggest that biphasic cements could better match bone regeneration timelines, potentially improving outcomes in large bone defects compared to monophasic cements.
Related Concept Videos
The Bone Matrix
Essential Minerals for Bone Health
Calcium and Phosphorus
Calcium is a critical component of bones, especially in the form of calcium phosphate and calcium carbonate. Since the body cannot make calcium, it must be obtained from the diet. However, calcium cannot be absorbed from the small intestine without...

