Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

5.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
5.9K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.4K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

6.8K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
6.8K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

439
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
439

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Death reflection vs. death anxiety: Divergent paths to pro-sociality.

Death studies·2025
Same author

Bridging numerical and verbal probabilities: Construction and application of the Chinese Lexicon of Verbal Probability.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

An open dataset of Chinese duration expressions.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Uncovering Individual Differences in Self-Control: Investigating the Relationship Between Subjective Hunger and Intertemporal Decision-Making.

The Journal of social psychology·2025
Same author

Which Matters More: Intention or Outcome? The Asymmetry of Moral Blame and Moral Praise.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Effects of childhood environments on the discernment of health misinformation.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K

Toward a mental arithmetic process in risky choices.

Li-Lin Rao1, Xiao-Nan Liu, Qi Li

  • 1Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Brain and Cognition
|October 17, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Risky decisions are not always based on mathematical expectation. This study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to show that preferential choices rely on different neural processes than expected value calculations.

Keywords:
Computational difficultyDifference in the minimum outcome dimensionP300Risky choiceSlow wave

More Related Videos

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

11.6K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

7.6K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Mainstream theories propose risky decisions involve maximizing mathematical expectation.
  • Understanding the neurocognitive basis of risky choice is crucial for refining decision-making models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms of risky decision-making.
  • To contrast preferential choice with expected value choice tasks using event-related potentials (ERPs).

Main Methods:

  • Utilized event-related potentials (ERPs) to record brain activity.
  • Employed two tasks: a preferential choice task and an expected value choice task.
  • Analyzed ERP components (P300, slow wave) in relation to task demands.

Main Results:

  • Computational difficulty affected the slow wave only in expected value tasks, not preferential ones.
  • Outcome differences influenced P300 and slow wave in preferential choices, suggesting heuristic processing.
  • Neural evidence indicates preferential choice does not solely rely on expectation computation.

Conclusions:

  • Preferential risky decision-making appears to engage different neurocognitive processes than expected value calculations.
  • Findings challenge the universality of expectation-based theories in describing individual risky choices.
  • Suggests a need to incorporate heuristic-based mechanisms into models of decision-making under risk.