Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

In vivo Reprogramming of Adult Somatic Cells to Pluripotency by Overexpression of Yamanaka Factors
Published on: December 17, 2013
Effect of in vivo administration of reprogramming factors in the mouse liver
Akira Tomokuni1, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Hiromitsu Hoshino
1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871;
Abstract:
Cancer is initiated by the transformation of stem cells or progenitor cells via a dedifferentiation process that leads to cancer stem cells; however, the process involves the activation of growth-promoting oncogenes and the inactivation of growth-constraining tumor suppressor genes. The introduction of defined factors, such as those encoded by c-Myc, Sox2, Oct3/4 and Klf4, in normal somatic cells results in their dedifferentiation into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. We previously reported that these defined factors induced the development of induced multipotent cancer (iPC) cells from gastrointestinal cancer cells by reducing tumor aggressiveness. Previous studies indicated that although reprogramming may be facilitated by p53 inhibition, gain-of-function oncogenic mutations in p53 and oncogenic mutations in Kras-stimulated tumorigenic activity, and their roles in vivo are imperfectly understood. Hence, in the present study, the effect of direct injection of a Sendai virus (SeV) vector encoding four defined factors in vivo was studied using various backgrounds of transgenic and knockout mice, and was compared with that of direct injection of microRNAs (miRNAs) diluted with cationic lipid. The in vivo imaging data revealed transformation hot spots for p53 deficiency or conditional activation of mutant Kras, and the sizes were concordant with those in immuno-deficient NOD/SCID and uPA-NOG mice, as well as larger compared with those in the control mice. Overall, the present data on in vivo reprogramming indicated that Kras activation may facilitate the effect of cellular reprogramming in normal liver cells, and the effect of Kras activation is more apparent than that of tumor suppressor p53 deficiency. The results also revealed that immunodeficiency may increase the effect of reprogramming, presumably by blocking the immunosurveillance of transformed cells. These findings provide a rationale for further studies to develop a therapeutic approach involving direct in vivo reprogramming.
Insights
Cancer reprogramming in vivo is influenced by Kras activation and p53 deficiency. Immunodeficiency enhances reprogramming, suggesting potential therapeutic strategies targeting cancer stem cells.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Stem Cell Biology
- Gene Regulation
Background:
- Cancer arises from dedifferentiation of stem/progenitor cells, involving oncogene activation and tumor suppressor inactivation.
- Defined factors (c-Myc, Sox2, Oct3/4, Klf4) induce somatic cell dedifferentiation into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.
- Previous work showed these factors induce cancer stem cells (iPCs) from gastrointestinal cancer cells, reducing aggressiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the in vivo effects of defined factors for cellular reprogramming.
- To compare the roles of p53 deficiency and Kras activation in reprogramming.
- To explore the impact of immunodeficiency on reprogramming efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Direct in vivo injection of a Sendai virus (SeV) vector encoding four defined factors.
- Utilized various transgenic and knockout mouse models, including p53-deficient and Kras-mutant backgrounds.
- Compared reprogramming with microRNA (miRNA) delivery and assessed outcomes in immunodeficient mice (NOD/SCID, uPA-NOG).
Main Results:
- In vivo imaging identified transformation hotspots in p53-deficient or Kras-activated mice.
- Kras activation facilitated reprogramming in normal liver cells, showing a more pronounced effect than p53 deficiency.
- Immunodeficient mice exhibited enhanced reprogramming, likely due to reduced immunosurveillance.
Conclusions:
- Kras activation plays a significant role in facilitating in vivo cellular reprogramming.
- Tumor suppressor p53 deficiency has a less pronounced effect compared to Kras activation.
- Immunodeficiency enhances reprogramming, suggesting its potential role in therapeutic strategies targeting cancer.
More Related Videos
08:54In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression
Published on: March 29, 2019
09:16Suppression of Pro-fibrotic Signaling Potentiates Factor-mediated Reprogramming of Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts into Induced Cardiomyocytes
Published on: June 3, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming
In-vitro Mutagenesis