Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

8.9K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
8.9K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.4K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
9.4K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

10.0K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
10.0K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

9.2K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
9.2K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

7.7K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
7.7K
Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

2.5K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The influence of one memory retrieval on a subsequent memory retrieval.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

Acquisition of information from rapidly presented verbal and nonverbal stimuli.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

A front end to a theory of picture recognition.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Interference from related items in object identification.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

Conscious and unconscious influences of memory for object location.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same author

Taking the "text" out of context effects in repetition priming of word identification.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.1K

Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

G R Loftus1, M E Masson

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Washington, 98195, Seattle, WA, gloftus@u.washington.edu.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|November 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers propose a new confidence interval method for within-subject designs, offering a valuable alternative to traditional hypothesis testing for analyzing complex data and understanding population patterns.

More Related Videos

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.3K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.1K
Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.3K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychology
  • Data Analysis

Background:

  • Traditional statistics often focus on hypothesis testing.
  • Confidence intervals are commonly used for between-subject designs.
  • Within-subject designs require specialized methods for confidence intervals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce a novel confidence interval calculation for within-subject designs.
  • Provide a statistical tool to supplement or replace hypothesis testing.
  • Enhance the interpretation of sample statistics in within-subject studies.

Main Methods:

  • Develop a confidence interval based on within-subject error terms (subject × condition interaction).
  • Demonstrate a simple computation method (Equation 2, p. 482).
  • Relate the new interval to standard confidence intervals for mean differences (factor of √2).

Main Results:

  • The proposed confidence interval uses the same error term as analysis of variance, ensuring comparable conclusions.
  • The interval facilitates inference about population means from sample mean patterns.
  • This method offers properties analogous to widely used between-subject confidence intervals.

Conclusions:

  • This confidence interval provides a robust method for within-subject data analysis.
  • It enhances the understanding of statistical significance and effect sizes.
  • The approach offers a valuable alternative for data interpretation in social sciences and beyond.