Accuracy of Quantitative Computed Tomography Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Mandibles: A Cadaveric Study
Alfonso Miguel-Sánchez1, Jaime Vilaplana-Vivo1, Carlos Vilaplana-Vivo1
1University of Murcia, Spain.
Purpose:
The aim was to investigate the accuracy of quantitative computed tomography bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in mandibles, comparing measured BMD with calibrated BMD.
Materials And Methods:
Seventy mandibles from adult cadavers were used. Twenty tomographic cuts were made in each mandible. In each tomographic cut, a region of interest was located, and the bone density was measured in Hounsfield unit (HU). A polymethyl methacrylate phantom containing four inserts of different predetermined densities (hydroxyapatite 100, 200, 500, and 700 mg/cm(3) ) was used to calculate calibrated bone density. Correlation between measured and calibrated bone densities was calculated.
Results:
Mean total correlation between measured and calibrated BMD in the 20 sagittal tomography cuts showed almost perfect positive correlation (r = 0.998, p < .001). However, when average BMD measurements in HU were compared, the measured total BMD (in the 20 sagittal tomography cuts studied) was 54.99 ± 421.59, whereas the total calibrated BMD was 49.28 ± 364.95, with statistically significant difference (p = .001).
Conclusions:
There are discrepancies between measured and calibrated BMD; in this sense, a calibrated bone phantom with a predetermined mineral density should be used to determine the exact BMD before dental implants surgery.
