Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Common diagnostic flowcharts in infective endocarditis
B Iung1, P A Erba, N Petrosillo
1Cardiology Department, AP-HP, Bichat Hospital University of Paris Diderot, Paris, France - bernard.iung@bch.aphp.fr.
Insights
Diagnosing infective endocarditis (IE) is challenging. Advanced imaging like [18F]FDG PET/CT and leukocyte scintigraphy, combined with the Duke classification, improves accuracy in identifying cardiac infections and embolic events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Infective endocarditis (IE) diagnosis is complex, relying on criteria with limitations.
- The Duke classification provides a standardized approach but can be enhanced.
- Evolving diagnostic methods are crucial for accurate IE detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the role of advanced imaging in diagnosing infective endocarditis.
- To integrate new techniques with the Duke classification for improved diagnostic accuracy.
- To reduce cases of IE with unidentified causative microorganisms.
Main Methods:
- Transesophageal echocardiography for endocardial involvement.
- [18F]FDG PET/CT and radiolabeled-leukocyte scintigraphy for infection and embolism detection.
- Serological analyses and PCR for identifying causative microorganisms.
Main Results:
- Advanced imaging improves Duke classification accuracy for IE diagnosis.
- [18F]FDG PET/CT aids in detecting cardiac infection and embolic events.
- Leukocyte scintigraphy offers higher specificity than PET/CT for differentiating vegetation types.
Conclusions:
- Combining the Duke classification with novel imaging techniques enhances IE diagnosis.
- New imaging modalities and molecular analyses reduce diagnostic uncertainty in IE.
- Diagnostic flowcharts integrating these advancements optimize the workup of infective endocarditis.
Abstract:
The presentation of infective endocarditis (IE) has changed over time and its diagnosis remains difficult since it relies on the conjunction of a number of criteria which have their own limitations. The Duke classification allows for a standardized approach and is now recognized as the reference method for the diagnosis of IE. The diagnostic value of the different criteria of the Duke classification can be improved by the use of transoesophageal echocardiography for the detection of endocardial involvement and the use of non-cardiac imaging for the detection of embolic events. The number of cases of IE without identified causative microorganism can be reduced due to serological analyses and broad-range polymerase chain reaction on explanted valves. Radionuclide imaging techniques are useful when the diagnosis of IE remains uncertain. [18F]FDG PET/CT can be used for the diagnosis of cardiac infection and for the detection of embolic events or metastatic infection, keeping in mind the possibility of false positive diagnosis due to its high sensitivity. Radiolabelled-leukocytes scintigraphy is more specific than [18F]FDG PET/CT and can differentiate between septic and sterile vegetations. Diagnostic flowcharts are proposed to combine the Duke classification and recent imaging techniques for the diagnostic workup of IE.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Flow Sheet
Here's a closer look at the examples of flowsheets commonly used by nurses:
Graphic Sheet Documentation:
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

