Defining stuttering for research purposes
1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States; Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Journal of Fluency Disorders
|November 19, 2013
Summary
This study refutes criticisms regarding stuttering epidemiology, specifically incidence and prevalence rates. The authors defend their conclusions on stuttering occurrence based on current research, countering alternative definitions.
Area of Science:
- Speech and Language Pathology
- Epidemiology
- Developmental Disorders
Background:
- A letter to the editor questioned conclusions by Yairi and Ambrose regarding stuttering incidence and prevalence.
- The criticism focused on the definitions used to determine stuttering rates in epidemiological studies.
Discussion:
- This response addresses and refutes the arguments presented in the letter.
- The authors defend their established criteria for defining and measuring stuttering.
- The validity of their epidemiological findings on stuttering is reasserted.
Key Insights:
- The definition of stuttering significantly impacts reported prevalence and incidence rates.
- Established epidemiological research on stuttering incidence and prevalence is defended.
- Brocklehurst's proposed criteria for incidence research are deemed inadequate.
Outlook:
- Further research should adhere to consistent definitions for accurate stuttering epidemiology.
- Clarifying definitions is crucial for understanding the true scope of stuttering.
- Continued investigation into stuttering's complex nature is warranted.


