Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

21.2K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
21.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Relation of motor, linguistic and temperament factors in epidemiologic subtypes of persistent and recovered stuttering: Initial findings.

Journal of fluency disorders·2015
Same author

Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances.

Journal of fluency disorders·2013
Same author

Disfluency patterns and phonological skills near stuttering onset.

Journal of communication disorders·2012
Same author

Genetic bases of stuttering: the state of the art, 2011.

Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP)·2011
Same author

Characteristics of disfluency clusters over time in preschool children who stutter.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2010
Same author

Prevalence of stuttering in African American preschoolers.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2008
Same journal

Relationships between psychosocial aspects of stuttering and self-disclosure of stuttering in a Japanese sample.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

Stuttering representation on Arabic-language Instagram: Who speaks and what gains visibility.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

How does ChatGPT respond to stuttering-related frequently asked questions? A mixed-methods, cross-version comparison.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

Exploration of parents' and children's perspectives of change following Palin Stammering Therapy for school aged Children (aged 8-14).

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

Temporal patterns in articulation underlying repetitions, prolongations and blocks.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
Same journal

Advancing stuttering detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence-based models.

Journal of fluency disorders·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

10.3K

Defining stuttering for research purposes.

Ehud Yairi1

  • 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States; Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Journal of Fluency Disorders
|November 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study refutes criticisms regarding stuttering epidemiology, specifically incidence and prevalence rates. The authors defend their conclusions on stuttering occurrence based on current research, countering alternative definitions.

Keywords:
DefinitionIncidenceStuttering

More Related Videos

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

5.8K
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

37.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

10.3K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

5.8K
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
12:43

A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS

Published on: February 21, 2011

37.7K

Area of Science:

  • Speech and Language Pathology
  • Epidemiology
  • Developmental Disorders

Background:

  • A letter to the editor questioned conclusions by Yairi and Ambrose regarding stuttering incidence and prevalence.
  • The criticism focused on the definitions used to determine stuttering rates in epidemiological studies.

Discussion:

  • This response addresses and refutes the arguments presented in the letter.
  • The authors defend their established criteria for defining and measuring stuttering.
  • The validity of their epidemiological findings on stuttering is reasserted.

Key Insights:

  • The definition of stuttering significantly impacts reported prevalence and incidence rates.
  • Established epidemiological research on stuttering incidence and prevalence is defended.
  • Brocklehurst's proposed criteria for incidence research are deemed inadequate.

Outlook:

  • Further research should adhere to consistent definitions for accurate stuttering epidemiology.
  • Clarifying definitions is crucial for understanding the true scope of stuttering.
  • Continued investigation into stuttering's complex nature is warranted.