Antitachycardia pacing: a comparison of burst overdrive, self-searching and adaptive table scanning programs

Eight patients with the Siemens Elema "Tachylog" generator implanted for management of paroxysmal reentrant tachycardia were studied to assess the safety and efficiency of three antitachycardia programs. The programs investigated were burst overdrive, self-searching, and adaptive table scanning. There were five males and three females aged 19-62 years. Seven had Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, and one had dual atrioventricular nodal pathways. Four had right atrial electrodes and four had right ventricular electrodes. Patients were studied lying, standing, and exercising in all three modes, and the appropriate long-term programs were chosen. The generator remained in a program for 1 month, it was interrogated and the memory was read, and then it was reprogrammed to a different antitachycardia mode. Burst overdrive was unsuitable for long-term use in four patients, producing atrial fibrillation in one and ventricular arrhythmias in three. In this group, self-searching and adaptive table scanning were safe and equally effective (mean number of attempts/tachycardia 6.97 and 6.3, respectively). In the four patients in whom all three programs could be used, burst overdrive proved to be most efficient, the mean number of attempts/tachycardia were 2.4 (cf 9.6 and 9.0 for self-searching and adaptive table scanning). Thus, burst overdrive was only suitable for long-term use in 50% of our patients, but when safe it was more efficient than the other two programs, especially in those with narrow termination windows on exercise.