Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Building framework for nursing scholarship: guidelines for appointment and promotion
Judy Honig1, Janice Smolowitz, Elaine Larson
1Professor of Clinical Nursing, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.
This article proposes new guidelines for nursing faculty advancement, recognizing both clinical and research scholarship. It ensures equitable promotion pathways for all faculty, fostering a comprehensive view of nursing knowledge creation.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Academia
- Faculty Advancement
- Scholarly Recognition
Background:
- Nursing education is evolving with new doctoral degrees and a focus on evidence-based practice, comparative effectiveness, and translational research.
- This transformation necessitates a re-evaluation of traditional faculty appointment and promotion criteria in nursing academia.
- Existing pathways may not adequately recognize the distinct yet synergistic contributions of both clinical and research-focused nursing scholars.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline clear and equitable guidelines for faculty appointment and promotion in nursing academia.
- To incorporate the academic tripartite (teaching, research, service) while acknowledging the unique aspects of clinical and research scholarship.
- To provide a framework that recognizes a broadened view of nursing scholarship and new ways of knowledge creation.
Main Methods:
- Adaptation of Boyer's model of the scholarship of engagement.
- Development of guidelines incorporating shared scholarly activities and distinguishing criteria for clinical and research scholarship at each faculty rank.
- Delineation of a clear trajectory for professorial advancement.
Main Results:
- Proposed guidelines offer a clear and equitable pathway for professorial advancement for both clinician and research faculty.
- Specific sample criteria for clinical and research scholarship are outlined for each standard at each rank.
- The guidelines recognize significant overlap but also distinguishing scholarly activities and outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The proposed guidelines provide a framework for nursing academia to effectively garner the unique contributions and synergy of clinical and research scholars.
- Adoption of these guidelines supports an expanded perspective of nursing scholarship, acknowledging the coexistence of science and practice.
- This framework facilitates a clear trajectory for advancement, recognizing new forms of knowledge creation within the nursing profession.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Code of Ethics
Nursing Ethical Principles I
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting...
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide...
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...

