Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

08:28
Monitoring the Wall Mechanics During Stent Deployment in a Vessel
Published on: May 8, 2012
8.9K
Inter-observer variability in sizing fenestrated and/or branched aortic stent-grafts
H Banno1, H Kobeiter2, J Brossier1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, University Paris XII, Creteil, France.
Summary
Inter-observer variability in fenestrated and/or branched endovascular aneurysm repair (f/b-EVAR) sizing showed good agreement but identified critical discrepancies. These measurement differences in complex aortic aneurysms may impact clinical outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Medical Imaging
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Limited data exists on inter-observer variability for complex aortic aneurysm measurements.
- Standard EVAR (endovascular aneurysm repair) measurement variability is better understood.
- Complex aortic aneurysms require precise measurements for stent-graft sizing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess inter-observer variability in preoperative measurements for fenestrated and/or branched EVAR (f/b-EVAR).
- To identify critical discrepancies in measurements that could affect clinical results.
- To provide insights into sizing accuracy for complex aortic aneurysm repair.
Main Methods:
- Two independent observers reviewed CT scans from 268 patients in a French f/b-EVAR trial.
- Measurements included aneurysm extent, target vessel stenosis, aortic diameters, proximal landing zone, device diameter, and target vessel position.
- Reproducibility was assessed using kappa statistics, Bland-Altman plots, and Passing-Bablok regression.
Main Results:
- Overall moderate to almost perfect reproducibility was observed for most measurements.
- Critical discrepancies were noted in target vessel clock position (≥45 minutes) and location (≥5 mm).
- Discrepancies also occurred in proximal landing zone level and endograft diameters.
Conclusions:
- This study represents the first large-scale analysis of inter-observer variability in f/b-EVAR sizing.
- While measurement agreement was generally good, specific critical discrepancies were identified.
- These discrepancies highlight potential challenges that may influence clinical outcomes in f/b-EVAR procedures.
