Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hardy-Weinberg Principle01:49

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

62.6K
Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.
62.6K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

46.7K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
46.7K
Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

58.1K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
58.1K
Probability Laws01:49

Probability Laws

29.9K
Overview
29.9K
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

100.3K
Overview
100.3K
Punnett Squares01:00

Punnett Squares

12.0K
12.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Replaying germinal center evolution on a quantified affinity landscape.

Cell·2026
Same author

T-cell repertoire response in individuals with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Design principles of the cytotoxic CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell response.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Experimental immunologists in the era of artificial intelligence.

Trends in immunology·2026
Same author

Pre-existing neutralizing antibodies against cattle-transmitted influenza A virus H5N1 are detectable in unexposed individuals.

Immunity·2026
Same author

Genetic and environmental imprints on T cell receptor repertoires as predictors of graft-versus-host disease.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Temporal trajectories underlying adult neuronal diversity.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Transcription regulation of cell fate plasticity - from embryonic development to tissue regeneration.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Shared molecular and cellular programs during regeneration of glandular epithelia.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Lineage tracing in human cortical development.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

Cis-regulatory strategies in developmental patterning.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
Same journal

GABAergic neuron fate specification and lineage allocation: from development to disorder.

Current opinion in genetics & development·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Why Quantification Matters: Characterization of Phenotypes at the Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction
10:41

Why Quantification Matters: Characterization of Phenotypes at the Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction

Published on: May 12, 2016

11.0K

Universality and predictability in molecular quantitative genetics.

Armita Nourmohammad1, Torsten Held, Michael Lässig

  • 1Joseph-Henri Laboratories of Physics and Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, United States.

Current Opinion in Genetics & Development
|December 3, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative genetics of molecular traits is advancing. Universal evolutionary characteristics, independent of genetic basis, reveal selection and predict trait evolution across lineages, opening new avenues in evolutionary systems biology.

More Related Videos

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
10:08

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis

Published on: August 12, 2019

13.6K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

13.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Why Quantification Matters: Characterization of Phenotypes at the Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction
10:41

Why Quantification Matters: Characterization of Phenotypes at the Drosophila Larval Neuromuscular Junction

Published on: May 12, 2016

11.0K
Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
10:08

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis

Published on: August 12, 2019

13.6K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

13.6K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Quantitative genetics
  • Systems biology

Background:

  • Molecular traits (gene expression, protein binding) are measurable via high-throughput techniques.
  • These traits are crucial targets of natural selection in evolution.
  • Understanding the evolutionary genetics of molecular traits is a growing field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent developments in evolutionary theory and experiments for quantitative genetics of molecular traits.
  • To focus on universal evolutionary characteristics that are independent of a trait's genetic basis.
  • To demonstrate how universal measurements can infer selection and predict trait evolution.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent theoretical and experimental developments in evolutionary biology.
  • Focus on universal evolutionary characteristics of molecular traits.
  • Analysis of trait statistics across cellular scales.

Main Results:

  • Universal evolutionary measurements can infer selection acting on quantitative traits.
  • These measurements determine the evolutionary mode (conservation or adaptation).
  • Universality is linked to the predictability of trait evolution across different lineages.

Conclusions:

  • Universal trait statistics provide insights into evolutionary modes and predictability.
  • This approach extends across various cellular scales.
  • It opens new research avenues in quantitative evolutionary systems biology.