Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

24.2K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
24.2K
Ranks01:02

Ranks

591
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
591
Nominal Level of Measurement00:56

Nominal Level of Measurement

25.7K
The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. Not every statistical operation can be used with every set of data. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal...
25.7K
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data01:11

How Data are Classified: Categorical Data

29.3K
A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
29.3K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

24.9K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
24.9K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

595
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
595

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The BRIEF-A, a gold standard on shaky ground: An item-level reassessment of its factorial structure.

Applied neuropsychology. Adult·2026
Same author

Revising Parental Burnout Theory: Toward a Differentiation of Sleep-Related Burnout Subtypes.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

The couple Energy & Engagement Model: a new operational theory for relationship burn-out.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Is a full psychotherapy program necessary to reduce benzodiazepine dependence for insomnia? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Drug Tapering with Single-Session CBT vs. Full Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.

Sleep medicine·2026
Same author

Drivers of suboptimal sleep education and insomnia in children: A Cognitive and Emotional Model of Young Children's Insomnia (CEMYCI).

Sleep medicine·2026
Same author

Humor as a double-edged weapon in psychopathology: light and dark humor styles, coping, and personality in police mental health.

Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)·2025
Same journal

BAYESIAN MIXED MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING FOR AUDITORY PROCESSING.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

Psychometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.0K

Cultural Consensus Theory for the ordinal data case.

Royce Anders1, William H Batchelder

  • 1University of California, Irvine, USA, andersr@uci.edu.

Psychometrika
|December 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new model for ordinal data, enhancing Cultural Consensus Theory. It measures response biases, consensus values, and informant knowledge in multicultural settings.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

2.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

6.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.1K
RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans
11:09

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

2.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Cultural Consensus Theory (CCT) traditionally analyzes agreement within groups.
  • Existing models often struggle with complex, ordered categorical (polytomous) data.
  • Measuring nuanced aspects like response biases and informant knowledge within CCT requires advanced statistical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel statistical model for ordered polytomous data within a Cultural Consensus Theory framework.
  • To introduce methods for quantifying response biases, consensus item values, consensus response scales, item difficulty, and informant knowledge.
  • To extend the model for analyzing multicultural data with subgroup variations in consensus.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new model for ordered polytomous data based on Cultural Consensus Theory.
  • Extension of the model as a finite mixture model to accommodate subgroup heterogeneity.
  • Application of a hierarchical Bayesian framework for statistical inference.
  • Implementation of posterior predictive checks to validate model assumptions.

Main Results:

  • The proposed model effectively measures response biases and consensus parameters for ordinal data.
  • The finite mixture extension successfully fits multicultural data, identifying distinct subgroups with varying consensus.
  • The model provides a robust, model-based clustering approach for ordinal survey data.
  • Bayesian inference and predictive checks ensure the reliability and validity of the model's findings.

Conclusions:

  • The developed model offers a significant advancement for analyzing cultural consensus with complex ordinal data.
  • The finite mixture extension provides a powerful tool for understanding cultural diversity and subgroup differences.
  • This approach enhances the measurement of key cultural and individual-level parameters in social science research.