Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

666
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
666
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.6K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.6K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.7K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.7K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

8.7K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
8.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Regression Using 20 Samples to Harmonize a Point-of-Care Analyzer With a Commercial Laboratory Analyzer for Feline Plasma Biochemistry Testing.

Veterinary clinical pathology·2026
Same author

Digital Cytopathology Quality Guidelines.

Veterinary clinical pathology·2026
Same author

The new Health-Related Quality of Life in Feline Chronic Kidney Disease Questionnaire demonstrates reliability and validity for use in feline clinical trials.

American journal of veterinary research·2025
Same author

Response to Letter to the Editor.

Veterinary clinical pathology·2025
Same author

The new Health-Related Quality of Life in Dog Chronic Kidney Disease Questionnaire demonstrates reliability and validity for use in canine clinical trials.

American journal of veterinary research·2025
Same author

Comparison of human point-of-care glucometer (Guide Me) and lactometer (Lactate Plus) to an automated chemistry analyzer for measurement of blood concentrations of lactate and glucose in juvenile commercial pigs.

Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc·2025
Same journal

Correction to "ASVCP Guidelines: Principles of Quality Assurance and Standards for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (Version 3.0)".

Veterinary clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Kinetics of Regenerating Protein 3E and C-Reactive Protein in Healthy Dogs, Dogs Undergoing Tibial Plateau Leveling Osteotomy, and Dogs With Sepsis.

Veterinary clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Establishment of Haemonetics TEG 6s Reference Interval in Healthy Dogs.

Veterinary clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Loss of Stability for Blood Urea Nitrogen in Cattle Serum Samples Stored for 3 and 6 Months at -20°C and -80°C.

Veterinary clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Small-Sample Reference Interval Estimation: A Comparative Analysis of HARISS, Robust, Parametric, and Nonparametric Methods Using a Computer-Simulation Study.

Veterinary clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

What Is Your Diagnosis? Blood Smear From a Mixed-Breed Dog.

Veterinary clinical pathology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

16.6K

ASVCP guidelines: allowable total error guidelines for biochemistry.

Kendal E Harr1, Bente Flatland, Mary Nabity

  • 1URIKA, LLC, Mukilteo, WA, USA.

Veterinary Clinical Pathology
|December 11, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Laboratory equipment requires regular assessment for accurate veterinary diagnostics. These guidelines establish allowable total error (TEa) for biochemical analytes in cats, dogs, and horses to ensure reliable results across different veterinary settings.

Keywords:
BiasQuality Assuranceimprecisioninaccuracyquality control material

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

14.6K
An Intestine/Liver Microphysiological System for Drug Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Assessment
08:59

An Intestine/Liver Microphysiological System for Drug Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Assessment

Published on: December 3, 2020

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification
09:04

Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification

Published on: August 17, 2015

16.6K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

14.6K
An Intestine/Liver Microphysiological System for Drug Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Assessment
08:59

An Intestine/Liver Microphysiological System for Drug Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Assessment

Published on: December 3, 2020

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary diagnostics
  • Analytical chemistry
  • Laboratory medicine

Background:

  • Laboratory equipment performance can degrade over time, necessitating regular assessments to ensure accurate and precise results.
  • Comparability of results is crucial in veterinary medicine due to diverse settings (general practitioners, referral hospitals, reference laboratories) and instruments.
  • Allowable total error (TEa) is a key concept for defining acceptable analytical performance in laboratory testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidelines for the determination and interpretation of TEa for common biochemical analytes in cats, dogs, and horses.
  • To establish TEa values applicable to various veterinary laboratory settings, from point-of-care analyzers to complex equipment.
  • To ensure laboratory variation does not impact clinical decision-making in veterinary diagnostics.

Main Methods:

  • Recommendations for the determination and interpretation of TEa.
  • Focus on commonly measured biochemical analytes in cats, dogs, and horses.
  • Consideration of equipment used in general practice in-clinic laboratories and reference laboratories.

Main Results:

  • Proposed TEa values for biochemical analytes in companion animals.
  • Guidelines are applicable to both in-clinic and reference veterinary laboratories.
  • TEa serves as a measure for instrument performance assessment, quality control validation, and result comparability.

Conclusions:

  • The guidelines offer a straightforward approach to assessing instrument analytical performance in veterinary diagnostics.
  • Implementing these TEa guidelines promotes consistency and reliability of laboratory results across different veterinary facilities.
  • Accurate and comparable results are essential for informed clinical decision-making in veterinary patient care.