Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Field Measurement of Effective Leaf Area Index using Optical Device in Vegetation Canopy
Published on: July 29, 2021
Consistency of commercial devices for measuring elevation gain
Paolo Menaspà1, Franco M Impellizzeri, Eric C Haakonssen
1School of Exercise and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.
Commercial GPS devices show variability in measuring elevation gain. Garmin and SRM devices differed by up to 3%, with Garmin showing higher variability. Use caution when comparing elevation data from different devices or settings.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Outdoor Recreation Technology
Background:
- Accurate measurement of elevation gain is crucial for training, performance analysis, and safety in outdoor activities and sports.
- Commercially available GPS devices are widely used for tracking elevation gain, but their consistency and accuracy can vary.
- Understanding device-specific measurement differences is important for athletes and researchers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the consistency and accuracy of commercially available devices for measuring total elevation gain (TEG) during outdoor activities.
- To compare the performance of Garmin and SRM devices in measuring TEG under real-world conditions.
- To identify potential discrepancies in elevation gain data due to device brand, model, or settings.
Main Methods:
- Two observational validation studies were conducted involving mountain climbs and cycling events.
- Garmin (Forerunner 310XT, Edge 500, 750, 800) and SRM (Power Control 7) devices were used to measure TEG.
- Measurements were taken with and without Garmin's elevation correction feature.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in TEG were observed between Garmin and SRM devices (P < .05).
- SRM devices exhibited lower between-device variability in TEG (0.2%) compared to Garmin devices (1.5%) in study 1.
- Garmin's elevation correction feature increased TEG by 5-10%.
Conclusions:
- While measurements were consistent within each brand, TEG differed between Garmin and SRM devices by up to 3%.
- The study highlights the need for caution when comparing elevation gain data recorded by different brands or with different device settings.
- Users should be aware of potential discrepancies and consider device specifications when interpreting elevation gain metrics.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Differential Leveling
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device
Introduction and Methods of Leveling
Design Example: Maintaining Level of an Embankment
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling

