Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rational modulation of immune mechanisms synergizes the anti-tumor effects of targeted radiation therapy in pre-clinical models.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Racial/Ethnic and Regional Disparities in Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths among Children and Adolescents in the United States.

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities·2025
Same author

Digital Pathology and Artificial Intelligence Applied to Nonclinical Toxicology Pathology-The Current State, Challenges, and Future Directions.

Toxicologic pathology·2025
Same author

FcRn-silencing of IL-12Fc prevents toxicity of local IL-12 therapy and prolongs survival in experimental glioblastoma.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

A Novel B7-H4xCD3 Bispecific T-cell Engager (PF-07260437) Synergizes with Breast Cancer Standard of Care and Immune Checkpoint Therapies.

Molecular cancer therapeutics·2025
Same author

18F-FLT PET, a Noninvasive Pharmacodynamic Biomarker of Tumor Cell Proliferation, Detected Differential Response to Various Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) Inhibitors.

Molecular cancer therapeutics·2025
Same journal

AVA: Automated Viewability Analysis for Ureteroscopic Intrarenal Surgery.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same journal

Kidney Endoscopy Video to Preoperative CT Alignment for Depth Estimation.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same journal

Deep learning‑based cell type prediction in lung tissue from brightfield histology using CODEX-derived labels.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same journal

Reconstructing physiological signals from fMRI across the adult lifespan.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same journal

Axially Swept Light-Sheet Microscopy using scattering and fluorescence contrast mechanisms.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
Same journal

Analytic Bounds on GAMLSS Model Variability of Normative White Matter Brain Charts.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Automated Two-dimensional Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mobile Single-molecule FRET Probes
08:26

Automated Two-dimensional Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mobile Single-molecule FRET Probes

Published on: November 23, 2021

2.2K

Comparison of estimation algorithms in single-molecule localization.

Anish V Abraham1, Sripad Ram2, Jerry Chao1

  • 1Dept. Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75083 ; Dept. Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390.

Proceedings of Spie--The International Society for Optical Engineering
|December 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) offers superior accuracy for single molecule localization in microscopy compared to nonlinear least squares, especially without noise. MLE maintains consistent accuracy even with noise and model inaccuracies.

Keywords:
Cramer-Rao lower boundlocalizationsingle moleculetracking

More Related Videos

Single-Molecule Tracking Microscopy - A Tool for Determining the Diffusive States of Cytosolic Molecules
10:20

Single-Molecule Tracking Microscopy - A Tool for Determining the Diffusive States of Cytosolic Molecules

Published on: September 5, 2019

7.9K
Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy of Membrane Proteins using Single-Antibody Labeling
07:51

Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy of Membrane Proteins using Single-Antibody Labeling

Published on: March 20, 2026

490

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Automated Two-dimensional Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mobile Single-molecule FRET Probes
08:26

Automated Two-dimensional Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mobile Single-molecule FRET Probes

Published on: November 23, 2021

2.2K
Single-Molecule Tracking Microscopy - A Tool for Determining the Diffusive States of Cytosolic Molecules
10:20

Single-Molecule Tracking Microscopy - A Tool for Determining the Diffusive States of Cytosolic Molecules

Published on: September 5, 2019

7.9K
Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy of Membrane Proteins using Single-Antibody Labeling
07:51

Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy of Membrane Proteins using Single-Antibody Labeling

Published on: March 20, 2026

490

Area of Science:

  • Microscopy and Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Computational Science

Background:

  • Accurate single molecule localization is crucial in various scientific fields.
  • Existing estimation techniques face challenges due to photon noise, background noise, and pixelation.
  • Comparing the performance of different localization algorithms is essential for advancing research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and nonlinear least squares (NLS) for single molecule localization.
  • To evaluate the impact of noise and model inaccuracies on localization accuracy.
  • To introduce user-friendly software tools for single molecule localization and accuracy assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Review of Abraham et al. (2009) comparing MLE and NLS estimators.
  • Analysis of estimator performance under varying noise levels (Gaussian, Poisson) and model conditions.
  • Development and application of EstimationTool and FandPLimitTool software.

Main Results:

  • Both MLE and NLS estimators generally recover true single molecule locations.
  • MLE demonstrates higher accuracy than NLS in the absence of noise and modeling errors.
  • MLE exhibits consistent accuracy across different model mismatches and misspecifications.
  • At high noise levels, neither estimator shows a significant accuracy advantage.
  • New insights into MLE performance with different objective functions for mixed noise types.

Conclusions:

  • MLE is a robust and accurate method for single molecule localization, outperforming NLS under ideal conditions.
  • MLE's consistent performance makes it reliable even with experimental imperfections.
  • Developed software tools facilitate practical application and further research in single molecule localization accuracy.