Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
Published on: October 13, 2023
Addressing head motion dependencies for small-world topologies in functional connectomics
Chao-Gan Yan1, R Cameron Craddock2, Yong He3
1Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research Orangeburg, NY, USA ; Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute New York, NY, USA ; The Phyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Institute for Pediatric Neuroscience, New York University Child Study Center New York, NY, USA.
Head motion significantly impacts brain connectome analysis. Global signal regression effectively reduces motion effects on topological parameters, but may alter connectivity, highlighting the need for careful correction strategies.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Network Science
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Functional brain connectome analysis using graph theory advances understanding of brain architecture.
- Head motion in resting-state fMRI complicates accurate assessment of brain connectivity and topological parameters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively examine the impact of various motion correction strategies on the relationship between head motion and graph theoretical parameters.
- To evaluate individual-level and group-level motion correction techniques in resting-state fMRI data.
Main Methods:
- Individual-level analysis included head motion regression, scrubbing, and partial correlation.
- Group-level analysis involved regression of motion and mean intrinsic functional connectivity before and after topological parameter calculation.
- Global signal regression (GSR) was assessed for its efficacy in mitigating motion-related artifacts.
Main Results:
- Individual-level motion correction methods failed to fully eliminate motion-related effects on topological parameters.
- Global signal regression (GSR) effectively reduced motion-topology relationships but risked altering connectivity structure and hub distribution.
- Group-level motion correction proved crucial for accurate analysis.
Conclusions:
- No single individual-level method completely removes motion artifacts from graph theoretical measures.
- GSR is a potent strategy for motion artifact reduction but requires cautious application, especially with high-density graphs.
- Findings suggest some observed motion-relationships may represent neural signatures rather than pure artifacts, necessitating further investigation.
More Related Videos
09:01A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
Published on: May 7, 2014
08:36Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
Published on: March 21, 2019