Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.9K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.9K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

10.1K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
10.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.4K
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

9.1K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
9.1K
Multiple Bar Graph01:07

Multiple Bar Graph

8.8K
As the name suggests, a multiple bar graph is the same as a bar graph but has multiple bars to depict relationships between different data values. One can include as many parameters as possible. However, each parameter must have the same unit of measurement.
Each bar or column in the multiple bar graph represents a data value. These graphs are used primarily in interrelating two or more sets of data. The categories of different kinds of data are listed along the horizontal or x-axis, whereas...
8.8K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

4.6K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
4.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Error Cancellation During Early Task Performance.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

Adverse childhood experiences and adolescent mental health: The moderating role of parent-child relationships.

Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)·2026
Same author

The Creative Space Theory as a map to explore the mind.

Possibility studies & society·2026
Same author

Do You See the Difference Between Perfection and Excellence?

Psychology research and behavior management·2026
Same author

The relation of spatial skills, spatial memory span, and two anxiety types with statistics anxiety in European and North American University students.

The British journal of educational psychology·2026
Same author

There are no alternative hypotheses in tests of null hypotheses.

Frontiers in psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.8K

Error bars in within-subject designs: a comment on Baguley (2012).

Denis Cousineau1, Fearghal O'Brien

  • 1École de psychologie, Université d'Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier, K1N 6N5, Ottawa, Canada, denis.cousineau@uottawa.ca.

Behavior Research Methods
|January 31, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Calculating error bars in within-subject designs is challenging. This study introduces a new method to accurately plot confidence intervals or standard error bars in mean plots, improving upon existing techniques.

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.1K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.8K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.1K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistics
  • Research Methods

Background:

  • Calculating error bars in within-subject designs presents significant statistical challenges.
  • Existing methods, like the Cousineau-Morey method, involve data normalization and correction factors that can be difficult to implement in statistical software.
  • Previous workarounds, such as adjusting the alpha level, allow for confidence intervals but not standard error bars.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel, practical solution for calculating and visualizing error bars in within-subject designs.
  • To address the implementation difficulties of the Cousineau-Morey method in statistical packages.
  • To provide a method capable of displaying both confidence intervals and standard error bars in mean plots.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes a new two-step method for calculating error bars.
  • This method involves data normalization to remove between-subject variance.
  • A correction factor is integrated to debias standard errors, with a focus on practical implementation in statistical software.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method successfully generates accurate standard error bars and confidence intervals.
  • It offers a viable alternative for researchers facing implementation challenges with the Cousineau-Morey method.
  • The solution allows for the direct plotting of standard error bars, which was a limitation of prior adjustments.

Conclusions:

  • A new, implementable method for calculating error bars in within-subject designs is presented.
  • This approach enhances the visualization of within-subject data variability.
  • The findings offer practical benefits for researchers in psychology and related fields seeking robust statistical analysis.