Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

430
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
430
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

6.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
6.7K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.5K
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

4.3K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
4.3K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

674
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
674

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Travelling through time and space in working memory.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

The involvement of working memory during retrieval from episodic memory.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

How do humans learn about the reliability of automation?

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2024
Same author

The role of episodic memory sampling in evaluation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Sizing up the crowd: Assessing spatial integration difficulties in body size judgements across eating disorder symptomatology.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Evidence Against Novelty-Gated Encoding in Serial Recall.

Journal of cognition·2022
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.8K

Correcting the correction of conditional recency slopes.

Simon Farrell1

  • 1School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, 12a Priory Road, Clifton, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK, Simon.Farrell@bristol.ac.uk.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|February 26, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Recency effects in memory recall are initially more accessible, challenging temporal drift models. Farrell's (2010) findings on free recall remain robust against recent critiques.

More Related Videos

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

5.9K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
08:05

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers

Published on: January 5, 2018

9.8K
Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
05:54

Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading

Published on: October 18, 2018

5.9K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Farrell (2010) analyzed free recall data, suggesting recency items increase in accessibility during recall.
  • This contradicts temporal drift models, which assume decreasing accessibility.
  • Moran and Goshen-Gottstein (2013) challenged Farrell's analysis of conditional recency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate Farrell's (2010) free recall analyses against challenges.
  • To assess the validity of temporal drift models in light of recency effects.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations using a basic free recall model were employed.
  • The model controlled for conditional recency across recall output positions.
  • Statistical analyses were performed to compare Farrell's (2010) methods with Moran and Goshen-Gottstein's (2013) proposed procedure.

Main Results:

  • Simulations indicated Farrell's (2010) analyses were not significantly biased.
  • Moran and Goshen-Gottstein's (2013) method led to a substantial underestimation of true slopes.
  • Observed null slopes in immediate recall by Moran and Goshen-Gottstein were uninformative of true data slopes.

Conclusions:

  • Farrell's (2010) findings on recency effects in free recall remain valid.
  • The results continue to pose a significant challenge to temporal drift theories of memory.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand the dynamics of recency in memory recall.